From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Ulrich Weigand" To: "Joseph S. Myers" Cc: Bernd Schmidt , , "Hartmut Penner" Subject: Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 06:04:00 -0000 Message-id: X-SW-Source: 2001-09/msg00622.html Joseph S. Myers wrote: >On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > >> I have a question about how the MAINTAINERS file should be interpreted. >> Suppose you have somebody listed as maintaining port X. Does this grant >> the right to check in any patch for a problem that affects port X, or >> does it only grant the right to modify config/X/*? > >I'd say it means config/X/*, plus the entries for X in config.gcc, plus >documentation for X (options in invoke.texi, attributes in extend.texi, >specific issues in install.texi, ...), plus testcases for any feature or >bug specific to X (probably plus configuration for X in libstdc++-v3 / >libffi / ...). Is there consensus on this policy? I'm asking becausing I'm still waiting for approval for some changes to the S/390-specific config.gcc entries (which I thought I needed approval for ...). See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-08/msg00683.html Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best Regards Ulrich Weigand -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand Linux for S/390 Design & Development IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH, Schoenaicher Str. 220, 71032 Boeblingen Phone: +49-7031/16-3727 --- Email: Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com