* Re: missing gcc_eh
@ 2002-07-30 11:18 Carlos Ordonez
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Carlos Ordonez @ 2002-07-30 11:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andreas Jaeger; +Cc: gcc, pcarlini
Andreas, just realized that I didn't send the GCC 3.1 build configuration:
../configure --prefix=/usr \
--enable-shared --enable-threads \
--enable-cpp \
$RPM_ARCH-suse-linux
Thanks Carlos :-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: missing gcc_eh
@ 2002-07-30 16:55 Carlos Ordonez
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Carlos Ordonez @ 2002-07-30 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andreas Jaeger; +Cc: gcc, pcarlini
Andreas, thank you. I was missing the library libgcc_eh.a in the gcc
directory when I installed GCC 3.1 with the rpm. I guess I have to fix my
spec file. I thought I had included everything that starts with libgcc*, I
must have something missing, like the directory path is wrong. Anyway I
downloaded the rpms from the website, thanks you! That was of great help.
We are teaching a class for IBMers and I needed to convert to the 2.4.17
May2002 patches after an install and the easiest way was via RPMs. I need
to read more about the RPM building process to understand the SPEC file.
Thanks again. Carlos :-)
|---------+--------------------------->
| | Andreas Jaeger |
| | <aj@suse.de> |
| | |
| | 07/30/2002 11:15|
| | AM |
| | |
|---------+--------------------------->
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
| To: Carlos Ordonez/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS |
| cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, pcarlini@unitus.it |
| From: |
| Subject: Re: missing gcc_eh |
| |
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
"Carlos Ordonez" <carloso@us.ibm.com> writes:
> Andreas, Paolo, thank you for your quick response. I am trying to build
> rpms for gcc 3.1, glibc 2.2.5 and binutils The system I am building is
> Linux for S/390 - SuSE SLES 7 kernel version 2.4.7. I built binutils rpm
Oh, S390.
> 1st and installed it:
> pbc99213:/usr/src/packages/SPECS # rpm -qa | grep binutils
> binutils-2.12.1-1
> pbc99213:/usr/src/packages/SPECS # ld -version
> GNU ld version 2.12.1
> Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of
> the GNU General Public License. This program has absolutely no warranty.
>
> Then I built GCC 3.1 and install it (I am thinking I should have done
glibc
Better use GCC 3.1.1, it contains some important bugfixes for s390.
> 2.2.5 first and then GCC 3.1 - should I?) :
The order is ok.
> pbc99213:/usr/src/packages/SPECS # rpm -qa | grep gcc
> gcc-objc-3.1-0.1
> gcc-3.1-0.1
> gcc-c++-3.1-0.1
> pbc99213:/usr/src/packages/SPECS # gcc -dumpversion
> 3.1
>
> Now I am trying to build glibc 2.2.5 with the following options:
> CC="$GCC" CFLAGS="$BuildFlags -g -O3" ../configure --prefix=%{_prefix} \
> --enable-add-ons --without-cvs --disable-profile \
> --disable-nls --enable-omitfp %{_target_cpu}-suse-linux
>
> The last few lines before the error shows are:
> rm -f /usr/src/packages/BUILD/glibc-2.2.5/build-s390-linux/libc.so.lds
> make -s -C csu others
> make -s -C iconv others
> make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/packages/BUILD/glibc-2.2.5/iconv'
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/packages/BUILD/glibc-2.2.5/iconv'
> make -s -C iconvdata others
> make[2]: Entering directory
`/usr/src/packages/BUILD/glibc-2.2.5/iconvdata'
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_eh
libgcc_eh.a should be in /usr/lib/gcc-lib/s390-suse-linux/3.1. Please
check that it's there. If not, your build/installation of GCC is
wrong.
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[2]: ***
> [/usr/src/packages/BUILD/glibc-2.2.5/build-s390-linux/iconvdata/ISO
> 8859-1.so] Error 1
> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> make[2]: Leaving directory
`/usr/src/packages/BUILD/glibc-2.2.5/iconvdata'
> make[1]: *** [iconvdata/others] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/packages/BUILD/glibc-2.2.5'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
> Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.19724 (%build)
>
> I built a working system with kernel 2.4.17, based on SuSE kernel 2.4.7
> that I am using to build the rpms, which I have gcc 3.1, glibc 2.2.5,
> binutils 2.12.1. I am almost positive I build glibc 2.2.5 before gcc 3.1
> and everything appears to be working fine. Maybe I should build glibc
with
> my previous gcc and then build the rpm for gcc 3.1. Thanks for any help
you
> can offer. Carlos :-)
Btw. you can find SuSE RPMs (with additional patches) for S390 of the
current
toolchain consisting of glibc, binutils, gcc in my ftp directory:
ftp.suse.com/pup/people/aj/Current_Toolchain/
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.inka.de
http://www.suse.de/~aj
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: missing gcc_eh
2002-07-30 11:36 Carlos Ordonez
@ 2002-07-30 12:07 ` Andreas Jaeger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Jaeger @ 2002-07-30 12:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carlos Ordonez; +Cc: gcc, pcarlini
"Carlos Ordonez" <carloso@us.ibm.com> writes:
> Andreas, Paolo, thank you for your quick response. I am trying to build
> rpms for gcc 3.1, glibc 2.2.5 and binutils The system I am building is
> Linux for S/390 - SuSE SLES 7 kernel version 2.4.7. I built binutils rpm
Oh, S390.
> 1st and installed it:
> pbc99213:/usr/src/packages/SPECS # rpm -qa | grep binutils
> binutils-2.12.1-1
> pbc99213:/usr/src/packages/SPECS # ld -version
> GNU ld version 2.12.1
> Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of
> the GNU General Public License. This program has absolutely no warranty.
>
> Then I built GCC 3.1 and install it (I am thinking I should have done glibc
Better use GCC 3.1.1, it contains some important bugfixes for s390.
> 2.2.5 first and then GCC 3.1 - should I?) :
The order is ok.
> pbc99213:/usr/src/packages/SPECS # rpm -qa | grep gcc
> gcc-objc-3.1-0.1
> gcc-3.1-0.1
> gcc-c++-3.1-0.1
> pbc99213:/usr/src/packages/SPECS # gcc -dumpversion
> 3.1
>
> Now I am trying to build glibc 2.2.5 with the following options:
> CC="$GCC" CFLAGS="$BuildFlags -g -O3" ../configure --prefix=%{_prefix} \
> --enable-add-ons --without-cvs --disable-profile \
> --disable-nls --enable-omitfp %{_target_cpu}-suse-linux
>
> The last few lines before the error shows are:
> rm -f /usr/src/packages/BUILD/glibc-2.2.5/build-s390-linux/libc.so.lds
> make -s -C csu others
> make -s -C iconv others
> make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/packages/BUILD/glibc-2.2.5/iconv'
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/packages/BUILD/glibc-2.2.5/iconv'
> make -s -C iconvdata others
> make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/packages/BUILD/glibc-2.2.5/iconvdata'
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_eh
libgcc_eh.a should be in /usr/lib/gcc-lib/s390-suse-linux/3.1. Please
check that it's there. If not, your build/installation of GCC is
wrong.
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[2]: ***
> [/usr/src/packages/BUILD/glibc-2.2.5/build-s390-linux/iconvdata/ISO
> 8859-1.so] Error 1
> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/packages/BUILD/glibc-2.2.5/iconvdata'
> make[1]: *** [iconvdata/others] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/packages/BUILD/glibc-2.2.5'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
> Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.19724 (%build)
>
> I built a working system with kernel 2.4.17, based on SuSE kernel 2.4.7
> that I am using to build the rpms, which I have gcc 3.1, glibc 2.2.5,
> binutils 2.12.1. I am almost positive I build glibc 2.2.5 before gcc 3.1
> and everything appears to be working fine. Maybe I should build glibc with
> my previous gcc and then build the rpm for gcc 3.1. Thanks for any help you
> can offer. Carlos :-)
Btw. you can find SuSE RPMs (with additional patches) for S390 of the current
toolchain consisting of glibc, binutils, gcc in my ftp directory:
ftp.suse.com/pup/people/aj/Current_Toolchain/
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.inka.de
http://www.suse.de/~aj
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: missing gcc_eh
@ 2002-07-30 11:36 Carlos Ordonez
2002-07-30 12:07 ` Andreas Jaeger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Carlos Ordonez @ 2002-07-30 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andreas Jaeger; +Cc: gcc, pcarlini
Andreas, Paolo, thank you for your quick response. I am trying to build
rpms for gcc 3.1, glibc 2.2.5 and binutils The system I am building is
Linux for S/390 - SuSE SLES 7 kernel version 2.4.7. I built binutils rpm
1st and installed it:
pbc99213:/usr/src/packages/SPECS # rpm -qa | grep binutils
binutils-2.12.1-1
pbc99213:/usr/src/packages/SPECS # ld -version
GNU ld version 2.12.1
Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of
the GNU General Public License. This program has absolutely no warranty.
Then I built GCC 3.1 and install it (I am thinking I should have done glibc
2.2.5 first and then GCC 3.1 - should I?) :
pbc99213:/usr/src/packages/SPECS # rpm -qa | grep gcc
gcc-objc-3.1-0.1
gcc-3.1-0.1
gcc-c++-3.1-0.1
pbc99213:/usr/src/packages/SPECS # gcc -dumpversion
3.1
Now I am trying to build glibc 2.2.5 with the following options:
CC="$GCC" CFLAGS="$BuildFlags -g -O3" ../configure --prefix=%{_prefix} \
--enable-add-ons --without-cvs --disable-profile \
--disable-nls --enable-omitfp %{_target_cpu}-suse-linux
The last few lines before the error shows are:
rm -f /usr/src/packages/BUILD/glibc-2.2.5/build-s390-linux/libc.so.lds
make -s -C csu others
make -s -C iconv others
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/packages/BUILD/glibc-2.2.5/iconv'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/packages/BUILD/glibc-2.2.5/iconv'
make -s -C iconvdata others
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/packages/BUILD/glibc-2.2.5/iconvdata'
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_eh
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: ***
[/usr/src/packages/BUILD/glibc-2.2.5/build-s390-linux/iconvdata/ISO
8859-1.so] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/packages/BUILD/glibc-2.2.5/iconvdata'
make[1]: *** [iconvdata/others] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/packages/BUILD/glibc-2.2.5'
make: *** [all] Error 2
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.19724 (%build)
I built a working system with kernel 2.4.17, based on SuSE kernel 2.4.7
that I am using to build the rpms, which I have gcc 3.1, glibc 2.2.5,
binutils 2.12.1. I am almost positive I build glibc 2.2.5 before gcc 3.1
and everything appears to be working fine. Maybe I should build glibc with
my previous gcc and then build the rpm for gcc 3.1. Thanks for any help you
can offer. Carlos :-)
Carlos A. Ordonez
IBM Corporation
|---------+--------------------------->
| | Andreas Jaeger |
| | <aj@suse.de> |
| | |
| | 07/30/2002 10:38|
| | AM |
| | |
|---------+--------------------------->
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
| To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@unitus.it> |
| cc: Carlos Ordonez/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS, gcc@gcc.gnu.org |
| From: |
| Subject: Re: missing gcc_eh |
| |
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@unitus.it> writes:
> Carlos Ordonez wrote:
>
>> I am building glibc 2.2.5 and I am getting an error gcc_eh not found. I
>> have tried looking in the internet and found nothing. I am running with
>> gcc 3.1 in a 2.4.7 kernel. Did I miss something when I built gcc 3.1?
>> Any help would be appreciated. Thanks Carlos :-)
>
> Hi,
>
> irrespective of the specific problem you are reporting it seems to me
that
> the released glibc2.2.5 cannot be compiled fine with gcc3.1. gcc3.0.4
> should be ok OTOH. Alternatively, fetch CVS glibc. Andreas can you
> confirm/clarify? Thanks!
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2002-07/msg00787.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2002-07/msg00788.html
Yes, the appended patches are needed for glibc 2.2.5 to build with GCC
3.1 or newer. I'm appending them for reference.
But gcc_eh not there looks like a different problem. But without more
details and without a crystal ball, I cannot help.
Carlos, on which platform is this? What is exactly the message? How
did you configure gcc and glibc? Which binutils you use?
Andreas
2002-07-22 Philip Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/errlist.c: Remove extra weak alias
definiton of _old_sys_nerr. Define _old_sys_errlist as strong
alias.
2002-05-19 Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/errlist.c: Remove extra weak alias
definiton of _old_sys_nerr. Define _old_sys_errlist as strong
alias.
Index: sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/errlist.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/glibc/libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/errlist.c,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.8.2.1
diff -u -p -r1.8 -r1.8.2.1
--- sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/errlist.c 6 Jul 2001 04:56:12 -0000 1.8
+++ sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/errlist.c 3 Jun 2002 06:49:30 -0000
1.8.2.1
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* Copyright (C) 1998, 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+/* Copyright (C) 1998, 2000, 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This file is part of the GNU C Library.
The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
@@ -38,10 +38,9 @@ extern const char *const *__old_sys_errl
const int __old_sys_nerr = OLD_ERRLIST_SIZE;
strong_alias (__old_sys_nerr, _old_sys_nerr);
-weak_alias (__old_sys_nerr, _old_sys_nerr)
compat_symbol (libc, __old_sys_nerr, _sys_nerr, GLIBC_2_0);
compat_symbol (libc, _old_sys_nerr, sys_nerr, GLIBC_2_0);
-weak_alias (__old_sys_errlist, _old_sys_errlist);
+strong_alias (__old_sys_errlist, _old_sys_errlist);
compat_symbol (libc, __old_sys_errlist, _sys_errlist, GLIBC_2_0);
compat_symbol (libc, _old_sys_errlist, sys_errlist, GLIBC_2_0);
#endif
Index: sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/errlist.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/glibc/libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/errlist.c,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -p -r1.4 -r1.5
--- sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/errlist.c 6 Jul 2001 04:56:13 -0000 1.4
+++ sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/errlist.c 24 Jul 2002 11:17:01 -0000 1.5
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* Copyright (C) 1998, 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+/* Copyright (C) 1998, 2000, 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This file is part of the GNU C Library.
The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
@@ -38,10 +38,9 @@ extern const char *const *__old_sys_errl
const int __old_sys_nerr = OLD_ERRLIST_SIZE;
strong_alias (__old_sys_nerr, _old_sys_nerr);
-weak_alias (__old_sys_nerr, _old_sys_nerr)
compat_symbol (libc, __old_sys_nerr, _sys_nerr, GLIBC_2_0);
compat_symbol (libc, _old_sys_nerr, sys_nerr, GLIBC_2_0);
-weak_alias (__old_sys_errlist, _old_sys_errlist);
+strong_alias (__old_sys_errlist, _old_sys_errlist);
compat_symbol (libc, __old_sys_errlist, _sys_errlist, GLIBC_2_0);
compat_symbol (libc, _old_sys_errlist, sys_errlist, GLIBC_2_0);
#endif
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.inka.de
http://www.suse.de/~aj
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: missing gcc_eh
2002-07-30 10:33 ` Paolo Carlini
@ 2002-07-30 10:38 ` Andreas Jaeger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Jaeger @ 2002-07-30 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Carlini; +Cc: Carlos Ordonez, gcc
Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@unitus.it> writes:
> Carlos Ordonez wrote:
>
>> I am building glibc 2.2.5 and I am getting an error gcc_eh not found. I
>> have tried looking in the internet and found nothing. I am running with
>> gcc 3.1 in a 2.4.7 kernel. Did I miss something when I built gcc 3.1?
>> Any help would be appreciated. Thanks Carlos :-)
>
> Hi,
>
> irrespective of the specific problem you are reporting it seems to me that
> the released glibc2.2.5 cannot be compiled fine with gcc3.1. gcc3.0.4
> should be ok OTOH. Alternatively, fetch CVS glibc. Andreas can you
> confirm/clarify? Thanks!
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2002-07/msg00787.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2002-07/msg00788.html
Yes, the appended patches are needed for glibc 2.2.5 to build with GCC
3.1 or newer. I'm appending them for reference.
But gcc_eh not there looks like a different problem. But without more
details and without a crystal ball, I cannot help.
Carlos, on which platform is this? What is exactly the message? How
did you configure gcc and glibc? Which binutils you use?
Andreas
2002-07-22 Philip Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/errlist.c: Remove extra weak alias
definiton of _old_sys_nerr. Define _old_sys_errlist as strong
alias.
2002-05-19 Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/errlist.c: Remove extra weak alias
definiton of _old_sys_nerr. Define _old_sys_errlist as strong
alias.
Index: sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/errlist.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/glibc/libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/errlist.c,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.8.2.1
diff -u -p -r1.8 -r1.8.2.1
--- sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/errlist.c 6 Jul 2001 04:56:12 -0000 1.8
+++ sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/errlist.c 3 Jun 2002 06:49:30 -0000 1.8.2.1
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* Copyright (C) 1998, 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+/* Copyright (C) 1998, 2000, 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This file is part of the GNU C Library.
The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
@@ -38,10 +38,9 @@ extern const char *const *__old_sys_errl
const int __old_sys_nerr = OLD_ERRLIST_SIZE;
strong_alias (__old_sys_nerr, _old_sys_nerr);
-weak_alias (__old_sys_nerr, _old_sys_nerr)
compat_symbol (libc, __old_sys_nerr, _sys_nerr, GLIBC_2_0);
compat_symbol (libc, _old_sys_nerr, sys_nerr, GLIBC_2_0);
-weak_alias (__old_sys_errlist, _old_sys_errlist);
+strong_alias (__old_sys_errlist, _old_sys_errlist);
compat_symbol (libc, __old_sys_errlist, _sys_errlist, GLIBC_2_0);
compat_symbol (libc, _old_sys_errlist, sys_errlist, GLIBC_2_0);
#endif
Index: sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/errlist.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/glibc/libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/errlist.c,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -p -r1.4 -r1.5
--- sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/errlist.c 6 Jul 2001 04:56:13 -0000 1.4
+++ sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/errlist.c 24 Jul 2002 11:17:01 -0000 1.5
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* Copyright (C) 1998, 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+/* Copyright (C) 1998, 2000, 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This file is part of the GNU C Library.
The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
@@ -38,10 +38,9 @@ extern const char *const *__old_sys_errl
const int __old_sys_nerr = OLD_ERRLIST_SIZE;
strong_alias (__old_sys_nerr, _old_sys_nerr);
-weak_alias (__old_sys_nerr, _old_sys_nerr)
compat_symbol (libc, __old_sys_nerr, _sys_nerr, GLIBC_2_0);
compat_symbol (libc, _old_sys_nerr, sys_nerr, GLIBC_2_0);
-weak_alias (__old_sys_errlist, _old_sys_errlist);
+strong_alias (__old_sys_errlist, _old_sys_errlist);
compat_symbol (libc, __old_sys_errlist, _sys_errlist, GLIBC_2_0);
compat_symbol (libc, _old_sys_errlist, sys_errlist, GLIBC_2_0);
#endif
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.inka.de
http://www.suse.de/~aj
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: missing gcc_eh
2002-07-30 9:46 Carlos Ordonez
@ 2002-07-30 10:33 ` Paolo Carlini
2002-07-30 10:38 ` Andreas Jaeger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Carlini @ 2002-07-30 10:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carlos Ordonez; +Cc: gcc, aj
Carlos Ordonez wrote:
> I am building glibc 2.2.5 and I am getting an error gcc_eh not found. I
> have tried looking in the internet and found nothing. I am running with
> gcc 3.1 in a 2.4.7 kernel. Did I miss something when I built gcc 3.1?
> Any help would be appreciated. Thanks Carlos :-)
Hi,
irrespective of the specific problem you are reporting it seems to me that
the released glibc2.2.5 cannot be compiled fine with gcc3.1. gcc3.0.4
should be ok OTOH. Alternatively, fetch CVS glibc. Andreas can you
confirm/clarify? Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2002-07/msg00787.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2002-07/msg00788.html
Ciao,
Paolo.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* missing gcc_eh
@ 2002-07-30 9:46 Carlos Ordonez
2002-07-30 10:33 ` Paolo Carlini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Carlos Ordonez @ 2002-07-30 9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
I am building glibc 2.2.5 and I am getting an error gcc_eh not found. I
have tried looking in the internet and found nothing. I am running with
gcc 3.1 in a 2.4.7 kernel. Did I miss something when I built gcc 3.1?
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks Carlos :-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-07-30 19:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-07-30 11:18 missing gcc_eh Carlos Ordonez
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-07-30 16:55 Carlos Ordonez
2002-07-30 11:36 Carlos Ordonez
2002-07-30 12:07 ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-07-30 9:46 Carlos Ordonez
2002-07-30 10:33 ` Paolo Carlini
2002-07-30 10:38 ` Andreas Jaeger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).