From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1241 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2001 05:03:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1214 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2001 05:02:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dair.pair.com) (209.68.1.49) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Dec 2001 05:02:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 29401 invoked by uid 20157); 16 Dec 2001 05:02:58 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Dec 2001 05:02:58 -0000 Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 21:10:00 -0000 From: Hans-Peter Nilsson X-Sender: To: Geoff Keating cc: "Joseph S. Myers" , Subject: Re: Regression tester v. runtime libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00856.txt.bz2 On 30 Nov 2001, Geoff Keating wrote: > "Joseph S. Myers" writes: > > > Does the automated regression tester check for regressions in the > > libstdc++-v3 and libjava testsuites? > > In theory yes. > > However, > > - libstdc++-v3 got switched off because of a bug in linking C++ > objects compiled with different optimisation levels that would cause > FAILs to appear and disappear at random; and Is that the gcc <-> binutils mismatch with relocs against symbols in discarded linkonce sections that we discussed on the binutils list some time ago? (That description certainly matches what I saw then.) brgds, H-P