From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-42354-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 25206 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2001 17:55:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25183 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2001 17:55:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at) (128.130.111.12)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Dec 2001 17:55:56 -0000
Received: from [128.130.111.28] (naos [128.130.111.28])
	by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fB6HteW21843;
	Thu, 6 Dec 2001 18:55:42 +0100 (MET)
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 10:08:00 -0000
From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
cc: Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>, <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: misleading statement in bugs.html#known
In-Reply-To: <je1yi8bcn4.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.43.0112061855060.25049-100000@naos.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00290.txt.bz2

On 6 Dec 2001, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>|>> +C libraries, but it is permitted by the C standard.</p>
>|>                                           ^^^
>|> Perhaps we should mention *which* C standard? ISO C?
> Is there any other C standard?  Even C89 had this.

This I didn't know. In that case, the patch seems fine as is.

Thanks,
Gerald
-- 
Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/