From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14076 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2001 20:26:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13930 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2001 20:26:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at) (128.130.111.12) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Dec 2001 20:26:47 -0000 Received: from [128.130.111.23] (pulcherrima [128.130.111.23]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fBDKQdW16281; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 21:26:39 +0100 (MET) Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 12:29:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Janis Johnson cc: Joe Buck , Gcc k6 testing account , , Zack Weinberg Subject: Re: Build status page:Succes and failures. In-Reply-To: <20011212103425.A1741@us.ibm.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00721.txt.bz2 On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Janis Johnson wrote: > Joe and Gerald, what do you think of the new format? I'll check in the > changes when I hear from both of you. I had a look, and it really seems fine -- thanks for the (large) amount of work that you have put into this! > P.S. What's the tool that's supposed to be used now to check the > validity of html files? Personally, I mostly use validator.w3.org. IIRC Zack had a nice description on how to perform such a test which was part of a larger patch which required some splitting and I believe he didn't have the time to commit this part yet... Gerald -- Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/