public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* gcc-3.1/criteria.html -- i?86-redhat-linux
       [not found] <Pine.BSF.4.44.0204040033270.63137-100000@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
@ 2002-04-04  1:26 ` Jakub Jelinek
  2002-04-04  1:38   ` Gerald Pfeifer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2002-04-04  1:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gerald Pfeifer; +Cc: gcc

On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 12:34:43AM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> John David Anglin is going to test hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00.
> 
> Committed.
> 
> Gerald
> 
> Index: criteria.html
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-3.1/criteria.html,v
> retrieving revision 1.17
> diff -u -3 -p -r1.17 criteria.html
> --- criteria.html	2002/04/02 16:06:56	1.17
> +++ criteria.html	2002/04/03 22:33:40
> @@ -61,7 +61,10 @@ possible, the release will support other
>                        <td>alpha-unknown-linux-gnu</td>
>      <td><a href="mailto:rth@redhat.com">Richard Henderson</a></td>
>  </tr>
> -<tr><td>HPPA</td>     <td>HPUX 11.0</td>           <td>hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00</td></tr>
> +<tr><td>HPPA</td>     <td>HPUX 11.0</td>
> +                      <td>hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00</td>
> +    <td><a href="mailto:dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca">John David Anglin</a></td>
> +</tr>
>  <tr><td>Intel x86</td><td>Debian GNU/Linux 2.2</td><td>i386-pc-linux-gnu</td></tr>
>  <tr><td>Intel x86</td><td>RedHat Linux 6.2</td>    <td>i686-pc-linux-gnu</td></tr>

Do we really want to include 6.2 and not 7.2, when 6.2 is more
than 2 years old?

	Jakub

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: gcc-3.1/criteria.html -- i?86-redhat-linux
  2002-04-04  1:26 ` gcc-3.1/criteria.html -- i?86-redhat-linux Jakub Jelinek
@ 2002-04-04  1:38   ` Gerald Pfeifer
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Gerald Pfeifer @ 2002-04-04  1:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jakub Jelinek; +Cc: gcc, Mark Mitchell

On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Do we really want to include 6.2 and not 7.2, when 6.2 is more
> than 2 years old?

I don't think so.  I have been working to help Mark with updating these
notes for the last days and we are just not finished yet, that's all. ;)

Updating i?86-redhat-linux to 7.2 certainly will be fine with Mark, as
far as I understood.

Would you mind making this change and add yourself as a tester (in case
you are interested in doing that)?

Gerald

PS: The testing criteria will be updated shortly; basically, only running
our testsuite will be absolutely required...
-- 
Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-04-04  9:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <Pine.BSF.4.44.0204040033270.63137-100000@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
2002-04-04  1:26 ` gcc-3.1/criteria.html -- i?86-redhat-linux Jakub Jelinek
2002-04-04  1:38   ` Gerald Pfeifer

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).