From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15329 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2002 09:26:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15308 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2002 09:26:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at) (128.130.111.12) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Apr 2002 09:26:00 -0000 Received: from pulcherrima (pulcherrima [128.130.111.23]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g349PLd22250; Thu, 4 Apr 2002 11:25:21 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 01:38:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Jakub Jelinek cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Mark Mitchell Subject: Re: gcc-3.1/criteria.html -- i?86-redhat-linux In-Reply-To: <20020404041926.B17835@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00134.txt.bz2 On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Do we really want to include 6.2 and not 7.2, when 6.2 is more > than 2 years old? I don't think so. I have been working to help Mark with updating these notes for the last days and we are just not finished yet, that's all. ;) Updating i?86-redhat-linux to 7.2 certainly will be fine with Mark, as far as I understood. Would you mind making this change and add yourself as a tester (in case you are interested in doing that)? Gerald PS: The testing criteria will be updated shortly; basically, only running our testsuite will be absolutely required... -- Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/