From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24542 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2002 19:51:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24523 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2002 19:51:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (199.232.76.164) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Oct 2002 19:51:33 -0000 Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 181BFV-0000O5-00 for gcc@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 15:51:33 -0400 Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 181BF3-00066I-00 for gcc@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 15:51:06 -0400 Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at ([128.130.111.12]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 181BF2-000641-00 for gcc@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 15:51:04 -0400 Received: from pulcherrima (pulcherrima [128.130.111.23]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id g9EJop8Q022546; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 21:50:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 13:21:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: "BONNER,MATT (HP-Vancouver,ex1)" cc: gcc@gnu.org, Subject: RE: 3.2 and 3.3 release questions In-Reply-To: <6D805D4C4567D411AF32009027B683510B27CFB6@xvan02.vcd.hp.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_05_08, USER_AGENT_PINE version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00742.txt.bz2 On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, BONNER,MATT (HP-Vancouver,ex1) wrote: > Thanks for the fast response! Well, it took a bit longer this time. :-/ > Thank you for updating the web page, it looks fine now. If you > want a nitpick, the text in footnote 1 should read "Note that no > distinction is made between patches that are themselves buggy > and patches that expose latent bugs elsewhere in the compiler." Thanks for the note and the more detailed explanation (on "which" versus "that")! I'll shortly apply the patch you'll find at the end of this message. > Thank you also for the information on the ABI for 3.2.x and 3.3.x. > Can you point me to any document that talks about the details of > the changes? Unfortunately we don't have such a document yet(?), though I agree it would be nice to have one. Gerald Index: develop.html =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/develop.html,v retrieving revision 1.20 diff -u -3 -p -r1.20 develop.html --- develop.html 5 Oct 2002 10:41:24 -0000 1.20 +++ develop.html 14 Oct 2002 19:48:28 -0000 @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ stages of development, branch points, an

[1] Note that no distinction is made between patches which are -themselves buggy and patches which expose "latent" bugs elsewhere in +themselves buggy and patches that expose latent bugs elsewhere in the compiler.

[2] The Steering Committee is planning to prepare a list of such