From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-61653-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 11870 invoked by alias); 15 Oct 2002 21:34:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11863 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2002 21:34:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at) (128.130.111.12)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Oct 2002 21:34:58 -0000
Received: from pulcherrima (pulcherrima [128.130.111.23])
	by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id g9FLYt8Q007213;
	Tue, 15 Oct 2002 23:34:55 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 15:27:00 -0000
From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
To: Tony Bryant <brd@paradise.net.nz>
cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: C++ slow/swappy problem solved
In-Reply-To: <200210141454.35617.brd@paradise.net.nz>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0210152330500.60109-100000@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00877.txt.bz2

On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Tony Bryant wrote:
> I now have enough info for a workaround, and I've put an entry in gnatsweb -
> Do with it what you will....

This is PR c++/8218, and definitely a regression from GCC 2.95 which
means according to our development model we should fix it before the
next release.

Joe Buck beat me in marking this "high priority".

Gerald