From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1292 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2002 03:35:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1285 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2002 03:35:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dair.pair.com) (209.68.1.49) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Dec 2002 03:35:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 51746 invoked by uid 20157); 14 Dec 2002 03:35:55 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Dec 2002 03:35:55 -0000 Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 20:07:00 -0000 From: Hans-Peter Nilsson X-X-Sender: hp@dair.pair.com To: Zack Weinberg cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Target deprecation, round two In-Reply-To: <87isxyjxac.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00767.txt.bz2 On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Zack Weinberg wrote: > It is not clear to me whether interest remains in *-*-linux*libc1*. Well, for now there is for i?86. Note there was also a PR for 3.2.x regarding it being broken. (BTW, it's a regression there but the patch was too invasive for 3.2.1.) > i?86-*-linux*libc1 Having recently take it back to bootstrapland for C and C++, I'd like to keep it for a while. Java is out of question (assuming GC and EH are required), see archive and patch. brgds, H-P