From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path:
Received: (qmail 21984 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2002 18:05:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21630 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2002 18:05:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at) (128.130.111.12)
by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Dec 2002 18:05:00 -0000
Received: from [128.130.111.28] (naos [128.130.111.28])
by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gB9DbRM7012302;
Mon, 9 Dec 2002 14:37:27 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 10:06:00 -0000
From: Gerald Pfeifer
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Mark Mitchell ,
Nathan Sidwell ,
Janis Johnson
Subject: PATCH for Re: Bug tracking / Release Quality Assurance
In-Reply-To: <6190000.1039400391@localhost>
Message-ID:
References: <6190000.1039400391@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00462.txt.bz2
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>> What should I add to our new section on "Procedures and Policies" at
>> the end of http://gcc.gnu.org/gnatswrite.html ? Mark?
> I think 3 months is fine; please add that.
Thanks, I'll commit the following, once gcc.gnu.org is up and working
again.
Gerald
PS: I'll be offline starting tomorrow for most of the following two weeks;
would you mind committing this for me if the downtime takes longer, Janis?
*** gnatswrite.html.orig Mon Dec 9 14:37:03 2002
--- gnatswrite.html Mon Dec 9 09:27:51 2002
*************** version of GCC is released.
*** 95,100 ****
--- 95,103 ----
Procedures and Policies
+ Bugs in state "feedback" that have not received any
+ response for three months can be closed.
+
Bugs in category "bootstrap" that refer to older
releases or snapshots/CVS versions should be put into state "feedback",
asking the reporter whether she can still reproduce the problem and to