From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21984 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2002 18:05:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21630 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2002 18:05:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at) (128.130.111.12) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Dec 2002 18:05:00 -0000 Received: from [128.130.111.28] (naos [128.130.111.28]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gB9DbRM7012302; Mon, 9 Dec 2002 14:37:27 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 10:06:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Mark Mitchell , Nathan Sidwell , Janis Johnson Subject: PATCH for Re: Bug tracking / Release Quality Assurance In-Reply-To: <6190000.1039400391@localhost> Message-ID: References: <6190000.1039400391@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00462.txt.bz2 On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Mark Mitchell wrote: >> What should I add to our new section on "Procedures and Policies" at >> the end of http://gcc.gnu.org/gnatswrite.html ? Mark? > I think 3 months is fine; please add that. Thanks, I'll commit the following, once gcc.gnu.org is up and working again. Gerald PS: I'll be offline starting tomorrow for most of the following two weeks; would you mind committing this for me if the downtime takes longer, Janis? *** gnatswrite.html.orig Mon Dec 9 14:37:03 2002 --- gnatswrite.html Mon Dec 9 09:27:51 2002 *************** version of GCC is released.

*** 95,100 **** --- 95,103 ----

Procedures and Policies

+

Bugs in state "feedback" that have not received any + response for three months can be closed.

+

Bugs in category "bootstrap" that refer to older releases or snapshots/CVS versions should be put into state "feedback", asking the reporter whether she can still reproduce the problem and to