From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5172 invoked by alias); 27 Dec 2002 19:19:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5161 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2002 19:19:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at) (128.130.111.12) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 27 Dec 2002 19:19:55 -0000 Received: from [128.130.111.28] (naos [128.130.111.28]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gBRJJWB5004152; Fri, 27 Dec 2002 20:19:33 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:46:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: What are the chances of another release from gcc-3_2-branch? In-Reply-To: <200212160442.gBG4g1w26851@duracef.shout.net> Message-ID: References: <200212160442.gBG4g1w26851@duracef.shout.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg01469.txt.bz2 On Sun, 15 Dec 2002, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > My question: is it safe for me to stop testing gcc-3_2-branch? That is, > what are the chances of another gcc release such as a "gcc 3.2.2" coming > from the gcc-3_2-branch? High, I'd say, but this usually depends on the feedback users and developers give to Mark (and the community), and also on how long it'll take to stabilize the 3.3 branch. > I'm just looking for some insight into the branch status here. > My default plan is to keep testing with gcc-3_2-branch even after > gcc-3_3-branch is created, as it appears to be active. That sounds like a good plan, especially in the (hopefully unlikely) case we add regressions on the 3.2 branch. Gerald -- Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/