From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11605 invoked by alias); 2 Jan 2003 10:59:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11595 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2003 10:59:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at) (128.130.111.12) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 2 Jan 2003 10:59:42 -0000 Received: from [128.130.111.28] (naos [128.130.111.28]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h02AxEB5014223; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 11:59:17 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 10:59:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Nathanael Nerode cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: GCC still getting a lot slower In-Reply-To: <20021231214116.GA1953@doctormoo> Message-ID: References: <20021231214116.GA1953@doctormoo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00029.txt.bz2 On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Can we test compile time change of some *fixed* piece of code, perhaps? PR 8361 (http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=8361), which is basically the old PR 3083, is here for anyone to use. ;-) Gerald PS: It's no longer a completely fixed piece of code, as it's not possible to have preprocessed source that is forwards or backwards compatible with or from current mainline, but I have included two preprocessed files now. -- Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/