From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10280 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2003 12:03:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10273 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2003 12:03:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at) (128.131.111.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Apr 2003 12:03:30 -0000 Received: from [128.131.111.52] (naos [128.131.111.52]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3GC2uta027204; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 14:02:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 14:14:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Zack Weinberg cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Laurent Guerby Subject: Re: Branch created: gcc-3_3-e500-branch In-Reply-To: <87wuhva13v.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> Message-ID: References: <87wuhva13v.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00761.txt.bz2 On Tue, 15 Apr 2003, Zack Weinberg wrote: > I've just created a branch called gcc-3_3-e500-branch. On this branch > I am going to backport the PowerPC/E500 work, done mostly by Aldy > Hernandez, from the mainline sources to 3.3. I don't have any plans > to merge this branch back onto 3.3, but that might make sense in the > future. > > The branch will be regularly updated from the 3.3 branch. Commits > require explicit approval from me. Would you mind documenting this in cvs.html? Gerald PS: Laurent, I just realize that there we have a couple of (mostly) dead branches which nobody submitted information about; what do you think about removing them? PPS: I also had an idea on how to make this more structured: Could I convince you to gather all those branches that have been merged to mainline in a separate subsubsection at the end of that subsection? ;-) -- Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/