* New GNATS category: PCH
@ 2003-04-18 23:57 Neil Booth
2003-04-19 2:07 ` Daniel Berlin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Neil Booth @ 2003-04-18 23:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc; +Cc: Gerald Pfeifer, Daniel Berlin
I'd like to suggest a new category of PCH. It may not be worthwhile
putting it in GNATS, but it'd be nice to have it in Bugzilla.
Thanks,
Neil.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: New GNATS category: PCH
2003-04-18 23:57 New GNATS category: PCH Neil Booth
@ 2003-04-19 2:07 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-04-19 4:27 ` How's 3.3 coming (was Re: New GNATS category: PCH) Joe Buck
2003-04-21 3:06 ` New GNATS category: PCH Gerald Pfeifer
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Berlin @ 2003-04-19 2:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Neil Booth; +Cc: gcc, Gerald Pfeifer
If you put it in gnats, it'll be added in bugzilla by the converter.
How is 3.3 coming along, since that is what we are waiting for?
On Fri, 18 Apr 2003, Neil Booth wrote:
> I'd like to suggest a new category of PCH. It may not be worthwhile
> putting it in GNATS, but it'd be nice to have it in Bugzilla.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Neil.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* How's 3.3 coming (was Re: New GNATS category: PCH)
2003-04-19 2:07 ` Daniel Berlin
@ 2003-04-19 4:27 ` Joe Buck
2003-04-21 3:06 ` New GNATS category: PCH Gerald Pfeifer
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Joe Buck @ 2003-04-19 4:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Berlin; +Cc: Neil Booth, gcc, Gerald Pfeifer
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 05:06:55PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> How is 3.3 coming along, since that is what we are waiting for?
13 high priority regressions that aren't listed as being also 3.2
regressions. Five of these are compile time regressions or excessive
memory consumption regressions, so it seems that that is the main
blocker.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: New GNATS category: PCH
2003-04-19 2:07 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-04-19 4:27 ` How's 3.3 coming (was Re: New GNATS category: PCH) Joe Buck
@ 2003-04-21 3:06 ` Gerald Pfeifer
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Gerald Pfeifer @ 2003-04-21 3:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Berlin; +Cc: Neil Booth, gcc
On Fri, 18 Apr 2003, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> If you put it in gnats, it'll be added in bugzilla by the converter.
>> I'd like to suggest a new category of PCH. It may not be worthwhile
>> putting it in GNATS, but it'd be nice to have it in Bugzilla.
Neil, if you it'll help your (or anybody else's) work on GCC, I'll add
a PCH category to GNATS right away, but I recall from the last time that
I added a category on gcc.gnu.org that it's not completely untricky, so
somehow I'd prefer to be on the safe side and wait for Bugzilla. ;-)
Gerald
--
Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-04-20 21:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-04-18 23:57 New GNATS category: PCH Neil Booth
2003-04-19 2:07 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-04-19 4:27 ` How's 3.3 coming (was Re: New GNATS category: PCH) Joe Buck
2003-04-21 3:06 ` New GNATS category: PCH Gerald Pfeifer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).