From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2512 invoked by alias); 19 May 2003 09:20:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2465 invoked from network); 19 May 2003 09:20:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at) (128.131.111.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 May 2003 09:20:02 -0000 Received: from [128.131.111.52] (naos [128.131.111.52]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D9451378A; Mon, 19 May 2003 11:20:02 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 10:35:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Matt Kraai Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: "obvious" requirements In-Reply-To: <20030518232511.GE13668@ftbfs.org> Message-ID: References: <20030518232511.GE13668@ftbfs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01743.txt.bz2 On Sun, 18 May 2003, Matt Kraai wrote: > I'd like to make a obvious fix to tree.c (i.e., remove a blank > line). Should I add an entry to the ChangeLog and/or post the > patch to gcc-patches? ChangeLog? Dunno about such a corner case. gcc-patches? Definitely, though it's fine after the fact for obvious changes. Gerald -- Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/