From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-90007-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8374 invoked by alias); 26 Jan 2004 19:46:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8362 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2004 19:46:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at) (128.131.111.2)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Jan 2004 19:46:08 -0000
Received: from [128.131.111.60] (acrux [128.131.111.60])
	by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id DD1961378E; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 20:45:58 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 20:06:00 -0000
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: Joern Rennecke <joern.rennecke@superh.com>
Cc: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>,
	Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@redhat.com>,
	Roger Sayle <roger@eyesopen.com>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org,
	gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha
In-Reply-To: <200401261942.i0QJg7714298@linsvr1.uk.superh.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.58.0401262044560.8891@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
References: <200401261942.i0QJg7714298@linsvr1.uk.superh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01962.txt.bz2

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004, Joern Rennecke wrote:
> Isn't it up to the release manager to specify which patches he wants to
> be applied to the branch?

Currently the 3.4 branch is open for regression fixes.

(In general I try to keep the current status of all active release
branches on the GCC main web page, so that's a good reference. ;-) )

Gerald