From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28388 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2004 15:47:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28381 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2004 15:47:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at) (128.131.111.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Mar 2004 15:47:53 -0000 Received: from [128.131.111.60] (acrux [128.131.111.60]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D0091378A; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 16:47:36 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 15:47:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Richard Guenther Cc: Diego Novillo , Paolo Bonzini , GCC Development Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status In-Reply-To: <40532C39.6070909@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> Message-ID: References: <000e01c4090b$4b9f5540$5adf1d97@philo> <40532322.3080600@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> <1079192233.3173.324.camel@localhost.localdomain> <40532B5E.1000905@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> <1079192497.3173.326.camel@localhost.localdomain> <40532C39.6070909@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00612.txt.bz2 On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Richard Guenther wrote: > Yes, I suspect for a start we can move some optimizations from -O2 to > -O3 to improve -O2 compile time. Now, that's cheating, isn't it? This is acceptable if and only if it really never hurts runtime performance, but then I don't see the benefit of such optimizations at all! Gerald -- Gerald Pfeifer (Jerry) gerald@pfeifer.com http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/