From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@synopsys.COM>
Cc: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>,
Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>,
Janis Johnson <janis187@us.ibm.com>,
mrs@apple.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 15:47:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.61.0411251630550.80619@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041123103438.A2256@synopsys.com>
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Joe Buck wrote:
> I'd prefer for assignment to mean that the assigned person has agreed to
> look at the bug. With your change, we lose the ability to make the
> distinction: when I see a name in the assignment field, under your system
> that would give me no information about whether anyone is looking at it.
What I have seen in a large development environment is a slight
variation of our current Bugzilla workflow:
After a bug is assigned to someone, it remains in state NEW, and
it's up to the developer (or her manager) to ACCEPT that assignment.
We wouldn't need new fields nor state in GCC Bugzilla, just slightly
adjust the workflow.
Gerald
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-25 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-23 1:16 Mark Mitchell
2004-11-23 1:21 ` Kazu Hirata
2004-11-23 1:28 ` Diego Novillo
2004-11-23 1:31 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-11-23 1:37 ` Diego Novillo
2004-11-23 11:46 ` Nathan Sidwell
2004-11-23 16:09 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-11-23 2:15 ` Mike Stump
2004-11-23 2:31 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-11-23 3:00 ` Giovanni Bajo
2004-11-23 8:17 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-11-23 8:39 ` H. J. Lu
2004-11-23 17:19 ` Janis Johnson
2004-11-23 17:23 ` Giovanni Bajo
2004-11-23 18:02 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-11-23 18:20 ` Joe Buck
2004-11-23 18:34 ` Giovanni Bajo
2004-11-23 19:01 ` Joe Buck
2004-11-25 15:47 ` Gerald Pfeifer [this message]
2004-11-23 18:03 ` Janis Johnson
2004-11-23 22:14 ` Mike Stump
2004-11-24 18:44 ` Giovanni Bajo
2004-11-25 12:41 ` Richard Sandiford
2004-11-25 18:03 ` Mike Stump
[not found] ` <41A3B68A.5020408@cs.york.ac.uk>
2004-11-23 23:52 ` Mike Stump
2004-11-24 18:49 ` Giovanni Bajo
2004-11-24 19:39 ` Joe Buck
2004-11-28 13:02 ` Toon Moene
2004-11-24 17:29 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-11-24 17:32 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-11-24 17:38 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-11-28 12:59 ` Toon Moene
2004-11-29 5:02 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-11-29 11:30 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-11-29 13:53 ` Paul Brook
2004-11-29 14:06 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-11-29 16:07 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-11-29 21:47 ` Phil Edwards
2004-11-29 21:59 ` Paul Brook
2004-11-29 23:27 ` Phil Edwards
2004-11-30 22:49 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2004-11-23 20:05 Richard Kenner
2004-11-28 13:41 Richard Kenner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.BSF.4.61.0411251630550.80619@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at \
--to=gerald@pfeifer.com \
--cc=Joe.Buck@synopsys.COM \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=janis187@us.ibm.com \
--cc=mark@codesourcery.com \
--cc=mrs@apple.com \
--cc=rasky@develer.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).