From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23369 invoked by alias); 9 Jul 2005 22:17:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23340 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jul 2005 22:16:57 -0000 Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (HELO vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at) (128.131.111.2) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Jul 2005 22:16:57 +0000 Received: from [128.131.111.48] (pulcherrima [128.131.111.48]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30A0B13797; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 00:16:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 22:17:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Daniel Berlin Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: 4.1 news item In-Reply-To: <1120870920.7757.22.camel@linux.site> Message-ID: References: <1120855271.7999.13.camel@linux.site> <1120870920.7757.22.camel@linux.site> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00335.txt.bz2 On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote: > Here's a patch. Thanks. There are a couple of commas between items missing (usually when there is a line break) and some of the lines are too long (as with GCC sources we generally prefer lines no longer than ~77 characters). Is the new stack checking infrastructure really a port of IBM Pro Police, or a reimplementation by RTH and Jakub? Gerald