From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11057 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2005 22:07:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10454 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jul 2005 22:07:07 -0000 Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (HELO vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at) (128.131.111.2) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 22:07:07 +0000 Received: from [128.131.111.48] (pulcherrima [128.131.111.48]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A5E137BE; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 00:07:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 22:07:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Steven Bosscher , "Joseph S. Myers" Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Giovanni Bajo , Andrew Pinski , Daniel Berlin Subject: Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1120855271.7999.13.camel@linux.site> <02ed01c5860a$33ba75e0$bf03030a@trilan> <200507112336.46828.stevenb@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00461.txt.bz2 On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Steven Bosscher wrote: > Another idea that was coined on IRC is to have reviewing and commit > after approval rules for the user manual, but to allow patches to the > internals manual in without review. Is that something people are > willing to consider and discuss? I think this needs to be decided by the current maintainers in question (that is, those who generally make or review patches to the internals manual), but I'd be fine with that. On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > Perhaps some parts of the compiler need more maintainers. In addition, > if someone makes good contributions to the documentation in a particular > area they can be made a maintainer for that part of the documentation. Absolutely, on both regards. Gerald