From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22153 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2002 11:06:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22144 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2002 11:06:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl) (213.192.72.1) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Oct 2002 11:06:14 -0000 Received: from localhost by delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA16489; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:06:30 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 07:01:00 -0000 From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Alexandre Oliva cc: "H. J. Lu" , "David S. Miller" , rsandifo@redhat.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Organization: Technical University of Gdansk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00939.txt.bz2 On 15 Oct 2002, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > Except that, with the current implementation of branch relaxation, > when you enable it, each branch will mark the end of a frag, so the > assembler will be effectively unable to fill delay slots anyway, since > it won't bring instructions from the previous frag to the beginning of > the new frag. Too bad. But the marking could get disabled if ".set nomacro" was on for a branch, couldn't it? -- + Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland + +--------------------------------------------------------------+ + e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available +