* Re: Manual style: "non-zero" vs "nonzero"
@ 2001-10-08 16:20 Brad Lucier
2001-10-08 20:50 ` Russ Allbery
2001-10-09 12:40 ` Brad Lucier
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Brad Lucier @ 2001-10-08 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jsm28; +Cc: Brad Lucier, gcc
Re:
> In the GCC manuals, which of the spellings "nonzero" and "non-zero" should
> be used? At present both are.
Mathematics journals definitely prefer "nonzero" (no hyphen).
Brad Lucier
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Manual style: "non-zero" vs "nonzero" 2001-10-08 16:20 Manual style: "non-zero" vs "nonzero" Brad Lucier @ 2001-10-08 20:50 ` Russ Allbery 2001-10-09 10:27 ` Phil Edwards 2001-10-09 10:43 ` Joseph S. Myers 2001-10-09 12:40 ` Brad Lucier 1 sibling, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Russ Allbery @ 2001-10-08 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc Brad Lucier <lucier@math.purdue.edu> writes: > Re: >> In the GCC manuals, which of the spellings "nonzero" and "non-zero" should >> be used? At present both are. > Mathematics journals definitely prefer "nonzero" (no hyphen). The 1989 OED prefers non-zero (as in it has an entry for that and has no entry for nonzero), but it may be out of date. Nonzero without a hyphen does appear in the current Merriam-Webster. -- Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu) < http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Manual style: "non-zero" vs "nonzero" 2001-10-08 20:50 ` Russ Allbery @ 2001-10-09 10:27 ` Phil Edwards 2001-10-09 10:43 ` Joseph S. Myers 1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Phil Edwards @ 2001-10-09 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Russ Allbery; +Cc: gcc On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 08:50:40PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > >> In the GCC manuals, which of the spellings "nonzero" and "non-zero" should > >> be used? At present both are. > > > Mathematics journals definitely prefer "nonzero" (no hyphen). > > The 1989 OED prefers non-zero (as in it has an entry for that and has no > entry for nonzero), but it may be out of date. Nonzero without a hyphen > does appear in the current Merriam-Webster. Funny you should mention that; there's currently a thread in comp.std.c++ which had a brief side discussion over whether Merriam-Webster was an appropriate dictionary in technical arenas. :-) My only thought is that non-zero might be easier to parse for people who are not as familiar with English.[*] Phil [*] ...such as the editors of the OED, har har har- just kidding! -- If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. - Samuel Adams ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Manual style: "non-zero" vs "nonzero" 2001-10-08 20:50 ` Russ Allbery 2001-10-09 10:27 ` Phil Edwards @ 2001-10-09 10:43 ` Joseph S. Myers 1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Joseph S. Myers @ 2001-10-09 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Russ Allbery; +Cc: gcc On 8 Oct 2001, Russ Allbery wrote: > The 1989 OED prefers non-zero (as in it has an entry for that and has no > entry for nonzero), but it may be out of date. However, a 1951 quotation it gives for non-zero uses the spelling nonzero (both spellings are also used in quotations for other words), so the usage is clearly well-established. -- Joseph S. Myers jsm28@cam.ac.uk ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Manual style: "non-zero" vs "nonzero" 2001-10-08 16:20 Manual style: "non-zero" vs "nonzero" Brad Lucier 2001-10-08 20:50 ` Russ Allbery @ 2001-10-09 12:40 ` Brad Lucier 2001-10-09 12:49 ` Geert Bosch ` (2 more replies) 1 sibling, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Brad Lucier @ 2001-10-09 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Brad Lucier; +Cc: jsm28, Brad Lucier, gcc > > In the GCC manuals, which of the spellings "nonzero" and "non-zero" should > > be used? At present both are. > > Mathematics journals definitely prefer "nonzero" (no hyphen). To weigh in again in this debate, the Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics recommends that "non" as a prefix not be hyphenated, that "semi" be hyphenated, and that "quasi" be a separate word. However, in a paper where I used both "quasi norm" and "semi-norm" I insisted that both be written with hyphens, as semi-norm and quasi-norm, and the copy editor acquiesced. This Chicago Manual of Style, 14th edition, recommends that the following prefixes be used closed (unhyphenated): non, ante, anti, bi, bio, co, counter, extra, infra, inter, intra, macro, meta, micro, mid, mini, multi, neo, non, over, post, pre, pro, proto, pseudo, re, semi, socio, sub, super, supra, trans, ultra, un, under (Table 6.1, page 230). The exceptions are capitalized works (anti-Semitic), numerals (pre-1914), English homonyms (un-ionized, not unionized), more than one word (non-English-speaking [using a hyphen, since English-speaking is hyphenated], pre-Civil War [using an en-dash, since Civil War is open]), prefix standing alone (macro- and microeconomics), repeated vowels (anti-inflammatory), misleading or puzzling forms (anti-utopian). Brad ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Manual style: "non-zero" vs "nonzero" 2001-10-09 12:40 ` Brad Lucier @ 2001-10-09 12:49 ` Geert Bosch 2001-10-09 13:27 ` Gerald Pfeifer 2001-10-10 2:59 ` Florian Weimer 2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Geert Bosch @ 2001-10-09 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Brad Lucier; +Cc: jsm28, gcc As a final drop, the GNU Coding Standards uses nonzero unhyphenated: | There should be a comment on each static variable as well, like this: | | /* Nonzero means truncate lines in the display; | zero means continue them. */ | int truncate_lines; -Geert ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Manual style: "non-zero" vs "nonzero" 2001-10-09 12:40 ` Brad Lucier 2001-10-09 12:49 ` Geert Bosch @ 2001-10-09 13:27 ` Gerald Pfeifer 2001-10-10 2:59 ` Florian Weimer 2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Gerald Pfeifer @ 2001-10-09 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc Okay, I'm convinced: "nonzero" it is. Thanks for all who contributed feedback, on the lists or privately, Gerald PS: And now, let's go for something more important and fix some bugs. ;-) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Manual style: "non-zero" vs "nonzero" 2001-10-09 12:40 ` Brad Lucier 2001-10-09 12:49 ` Geert Bosch 2001-10-09 13:27 ` Gerald Pfeifer @ 2001-10-10 2:59 ` Florian Weimer 2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Florian Weimer @ 2001-10-10 2:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Brad Lucier; +Cc: jsm28, gcc Brad Lucier <lucier@math.purdue.edu> writes: > To weigh in again in this debate, the Society of Industrial and > Applied Mathematics recommends that "non" as a prefix > not be hyphenated, that "semi" be hyphenated, and that "quasi" > be a separate word. What a strange rule! I haven't read much literature on semigroups, so I don't know if it is customary to put a hyphen in it, "semi-group" looks indeed rather strange. I've never seen "semi-simple" and "quasi projective". Perhaps SIAM made these rules only to annoy algebraists? ;-) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Manual style: "non-zero" vs "nonzero" @ 2001-10-08 15:33 Joseph S. Myers 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Joseph S. Myers @ 2001-10-08 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc In the GCC manuals, which of the spellings "nonzero" and "non-zero" should be used? At present both are. -- Joseph S. Myers jsm28@cam.ac.uk ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-10-10 2:59 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2001-10-08 16:20 Manual style: "non-zero" vs "nonzero" Brad Lucier 2001-10-08 20:50 ` Russ Allbery 2001-10-09 10:27 ` Phil Edwards 2001-10-09 10:43 ` Joseph S. Myers 2001-10-09 12:40 ` Brad Lucier 2001-10-09 12:49 ` Geert Bosch 2001-10-09 13:27 ` Gerald Pfeifer 2001-10-10 2:59 ` Florian Weimer -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2001-10-08 15:33 Joseph S. Myers
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).