From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11042 invoked by alias); 1 May 2004 14:09:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11035 invoked from network); 1 May 2004 14:09:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO diogenis.ceid.upatras.gr) (150.140.141.181) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 May 2004 14:09:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 26478 invoked from network); 1 May 2004 14:09:25 -0000 Received: from zenon.ceid.upatras.gr (150.140.141.182) by diogenis.ceid.upatras.gr with SMTP; 1 May 2004 14:09:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 12664 invoked by uid 2228); 1 May 2004 14:09:23 -0000 Date: Sat, 01 May 2004 14:09:00 -0000 From: Stelios Xanthakis To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Using EH from C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2 On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Stelios Xanthakis wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Richard Henderson wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 02:07:18PM +0300, Stelios Xanthakis wrote: > > > The main challenge is 'calling destructors on unwind > > > with no performance cost if no exception is raised'. > > > > type var __attribute__((cleanup(function))); > > That's just great. But of little use without another extension to create landing pads...:( Or is there?