From: Michael Matz <matzmich@cs.tu-berlin.de>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: Frank Klemm <pfk@fuchs.offl.uni-jena.de>,
Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>, <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: OT: Re: Proposal
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 18:32:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0109300238180.11225-100000@platon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010929201517.A6942@nevyn.them.org>
Hi,
On Sat, 29 Sep 2001, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > BILLION won't expand to what you think. As for UK notation, I'm
> > > British and I can't think of the last time I've seen a billion have 12
> > > zeroes. In fact, I think the only time it occurs is when people are
> > > comparing the claimed British and American forms :-)
> > >
> > A billion has no zeros: 1.e+12
>
> I think that what Neil meant is:
> % units billion
> Definition: 1e9 = 1e+09
May be for your country. E.g. germany has billion==1e12 (we have mi-,
bi-, tri-, quadri- and quinti- as first parts and -llion, and -lliard(e)
as second parts alternating. I.e million==1e6, milliard(e)==1e9,
billion==1e12, billiarde=1e15 ... quintilliarde==1e33) for those, who are
interested ;-)
Given that a million is 1e6 in both countries, and a _bi_llion is somehow
two times a m(ono)illion, and 1e9 is neither the double of 1e6 nor has
twice as much zeros, whereas 1e12 has, I find our definition more logical.
But then again I may be biased ;)
Ciao,
Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-29 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-15 11:45 Proposal Frank Klemm
2001-09-15 12:15 ` Proposal Gerald Pfeifer
2001-09-17 16:00 ` Proposal Neil Booth
2001-09-18 2:30 ` Proposal Joseph S. Myers
2001-09-18 10:21 ` Proposal Zack Weinberg
2001-09-18 11:14 ` Proposal Joseph S. Myers
2001-09-18 22:20 ` Proposal Zack Weinberg
2001-09-19 1:14 ` Proposal Joseph S. Myers
2001-09-18 12:23 ` Proposal Frank Klemm
2001-09-18 22:37 ` Proposal Zack Weinberg
2001-09-19 0:02 ` Proposal Neil Booth
2001-09-19 2:23 ` Proposal Tim Hollebeek
2001-09-19 2:41 ` Proposal Richard Earnshaw
2001-09-19 13:38 ` Proposal Joe Buck
2001-09-18 15:35 ` Proposal Robert Lipe
2001-09-18 16:59 ` Proposal Russ Allbery
2001-09-20 11:17 ` Proposal Kai Henningsen
2001-09-20 12:34 ` Proposal Russ Allbery
2001-09-18 9:48 ` Proposal Frank Klemm
2001-09-18 11:06 ` Proposal Neil Booth
2001-09-18 11:37 ` Proposal Kevin Handy
2001-09-18 15:48 ` Proposal Neil Booth
2001-09-18 15:55 ` Proposal Toon Moene
2001-09-27 5:39 ` Proposal Alexandre Oliva
2001-09-27 7:09 ` Proposal Frank Klemm
2001-09-27 16:22 ` Proposal Zack Weinberg
2001-09-29 15:45 ` Proposal Frank Klemm
2001-09-30 9:35 ` Proposal Zack Weinberg
2001-09-27 16:36 ` Proposal Neil Booth
2001-09-29 15:45 ` Proposal Frank Klemm
2001-09-29 17:22 ` Proposal Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-09-29 18:32 ` Michael Matz [this message]
2001-10-03 3:52 ` Proposal Fergus Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.GSO.4.33.0109300238180.11225-100000@platon \
--to=matzmich@cs.tu-berlin.de \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk \
--cc=pfk@fuchs.offl.uni-jena.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).