From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15872 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2004 00:20:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15830 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2004 00:20:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pine.cs.tamu.edu) (128.194.138.12) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 23 Nov 2004 00:20:18 -0000 Received: from unix.cs.tamu.edu (unix.cs.tamu.edu [128.194.138.13]) by pine.cs.tamu.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id iAN0KBvk007923; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 18:20:11 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (gdr@localhost) by unix.cs.tamu.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.10.2) with ESMTP id iAN0KBO20494; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 18:20:11 -0600 (CST) X-Authentication-Warning: unix.cs.tamu.edu: gdr owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 01:13:00 -0000 From: Gabriel Dos Reis To: Mark Mitchell cc: Benjamin Kosnik , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: The 3.4.X line future (for the next half a year)? In-Reply-To: <4199871B.9010605@codesourcery.com> Message-ID: References: <20041115214903.1e04ee29.bkoz@redhat.com> <4199871B.9010605@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00776.txt.bz2 On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Mark Mitchell wrote: | Benjamin Kosnik wrote: | | >>Yes, my current thinking is that I will run one more -- but just one | >>more -- GCC 3.4.x release. My primary focus is already shifting to the | >>GCC 4.0 release. | >> | >> | > | >Does this mean that Gaby will run 3.4.x after 3.4.4? | > | > | Assuming that he is willing, yes. I would suggest we concentrate on 4.0.0. If there are pressing needs for more 3.4.x, or the timeframe for 4.0.0 is unacceptable, then we may consider that option. my gut reaction would be to get 4.0.0 out with more there, and set a roadmap for even more useful 4.1 series. -- Gaby