From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-157790-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13495 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2009 16:56:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 13487 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Nov 2009 16:56:53 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,URIBL_RHS_DOB
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from caip.rutgers.edu (HELO caip.rutgers.edu) (128.6.236.16)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:56:49 +0000
Received: from caipclassic.rutgers.edu (caipclassic.rutgers.edu [128.6.237.54]) 	by caip.rutgers.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB1033084B 	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Sat,  7 Nov 2009 12:15:08 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:56:00 -0000
From: "Kaveh R. GHAZI" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Updating Primary and Secondary platform list for gcc-4.5 ???
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0911071153550.20504@caipclassic.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00190.txt.bz2

I was looking through the gcc-4.5 primary and secondary platform list
to ensure we have coverage for MPC testing.  It occurs to me that some
of the OS versions are outdated.

I've included the list from the page
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/criteria.html

Should we update:

1.  solaris2.10 -> 2.11
2.  hpux11.11 -> ???
3.  aix5.2 -> 5.3

For the purposes of MPC testing I also want to know:

1.  Is mipsisa64-elf cross-config only?  I.e. MPC portability testing
is only relevant to the host platform where GCC is run.  So we don't
have to worry about this one?

2.  i386-unknown-freebsd and i686-apple-darwin are generic, but
config.guess will supply specific version numbers.  What version
should MPC be shown to work on?  Any one of them would do?

3.  For freebsd and darwin, do we want to include specific version
numbers for our platform list, or leave them generic?

		Thanks,
		--Kaveh


Primary Platform List

arm-eabi
i386-unknown-freebsd
i686-pc-linux-gnu
mipsisa64-elf
powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
sparc-sun-solaris2.10
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

Secondary Platform List

hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0
i686-apple-darwin
i686-pc-cygwin
i686-mingw32
ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
s390-linux-gnu