From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mumit Khan <khan@xraylith.wisc.edu>
To: Theodore Papadopoulo <Theodore.Papadopoulo@sophia.inria.fr>
Cc: egcs@cygnus.com, Max Lawson <mlawson@drfmc.ceng.cea.fr>
Subject: Typename5.C failure i386-linux-gnulibc1 [Re: egcs-971127: testsuiteresults on i586-pc-linux-gnulibc1]
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 1997 11:03:00 -0000
Message-id: <Pine.HPP.3.96.971201125146.15682A-100000@hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu>
References: <199712011512.QAA18311@mururoa.inria.fr>
X-SW-Source: 1997-12/msg00034.html

On Mon, 1 Dec 1997, Theodore Papadopoulo wrote:

> From the other reports I see, you seem more to be the exception than
> the average case or maybe your are the only one with RH4.1 which seems
> unlikely.
> 

Nope, I'm not the only one. See 

    http://www.cygnus.com/ml/egcs/1997-Nov/0946.html          

for the results from Peter Schmid, posted on Nov. 29. He also does not see
the failure for typename5.C that you see. Max Lawson's message that shows 
the error message from running the compiler on typename5.C just doesn't
happen on my machine.

Mumit