From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Elliot Lee <sopwith@cuc.edu>
To: Bill Walker <bw@student.ecok.edu>
Cc: egcs@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: Size of generated programs (fwd)
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 1997 13:07:00 -0000
Message-id: <Pine.LNX.3.95.971208160635.2693A-100000@helix.cs.cuc.edu>
References: <m0xf9He-0000qNC@student.ecok.edu>
X-SW-Source: 1997-12/msg00490.html

On Mon, 8 Dec 1997, Bill Walker wrote:

> > I've had egcs up and running for a few days now, and have encountered no
> > problems with the programs I've compiled (other than the ones I make for 
> > myself).  One thing I've noticed is that the stripped executables are 
> > significantly larger than those I get with gcc2.  I compile with
> > 
> > -O3 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -malign-*=0  -malign-double -march=pentium (or
> > -m486).
> 
> 	I have had essentially the same experience, with C, FORTRAN,
> and C++.  The increase is anywhere from about 2% to about 10%, after
> stripping, and running through mcs -d.  OTOH, the egcs compiler seems to
> compile things that I just couldn't compile before, so I consider it
> a wash.

Add -fno-exceptions to the command line.

-- Elliot					http://www.redhat.com/
"They don't let my code go into shipping products," Gates said. "They
 haven't done that for eight years." (at the 1997 PDC)