From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux kernel account <linker@nightshade.z.ml.org>
To: Daniel Egger <Daniel.Egger@t-online.de>
Cc: egcs@cygnus.com, linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu>
Subject: Re: linux and EGCS PATCH
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 10:18:00 -0000
Message-id: <Pine.LNX.3.95.971212095802.14926C-100000@nightshade.z.ml.org>
References: <97121118012601.00692@server.paf.main>
X-SW-Source: 1997-12/msg00746.html

Compiled with PGCC 1.0 -mpentium -O6

limelight:~/kde# uname -a
Linux limelight 2.1.71 #26 Sun Dec 7 19:24:34 EST 1997 i586
limelight:~/kde# uptime
 10:00am  up 4 days, 14:30,  7 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
limelight:~/kde#


On Thu, 11 Dec 1997, Daniel Egger wrote:

> On Wed, 10 Dec 1997, you wrote:
> 
> >So at this point, I haven't had any real indications of the kernel doing
> >anything wrong, and egcs should be considered broken for now. I can be
> >made to change my mind, but so far all the indications are that if you
> >want a stable kernel you should not use egcs yet.
> 
>  Hm, here works a linux kernel version 2.1.72 compiled with egcs-971207 on i486.
>  It's up now for 48h and stands heavy network traffic without any problems.
>  
>  Servus,
>               Daniel
>