From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Scott A Crosby <crosby@qwes.math.cmu.edu>
To: Joern Rennecke <amylaar@cygnus.co.uk>
Cc: hubicka@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, egcs@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: Benchmark suite...
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 19:15:00 -0000
Message-id: <Pine.LNX.3.95.981111214950.27954C-100000@qwe4.math.cmu.edu>
References: <199811050731.HAA25613@phal.cygnus.co.uk>
X-SW-Source: 1998-11/msg00563.html

On Thu, 5 Nov 1998, Joern Rennecke wrote:

> > Another micro-benchmark to measure how well the compiler performs register
> > assignment:
> > 
> > // Test register assignment, passing reg_assignXX an array of XX values.
> > reg_assign1_8(int *a, int *b)
> > 	b[0] = 1*a[1] + 2*a[2] + 3*a[3] +  4*a[4] .... 7*a[7];
> > 	b[1] = 0*a[0] + 1*a[2] + 2*a[3] .... 6*a[7];
> > ..
> > ..
> >         b[7] =  0*a[0] + ... + 1*a[7];
> > }
> > 
> > Here, the constants in the right hand sides were chosen so that a simple
> > CSE would not work well on them, so this would test how well the compiler
> > performs register assignment.. (It could also test a much more advanced
> > CSE that could simplify this.) Again, a list of functons reg_assign1_16(),
> > reg_assign1_32(), are created...
> 
> This does not work.  a and b can be aliased.
> 

Whoops.. :-) 

How about:

// Test register assignment, passing reg_assignXX an array of XX values.
reg_assign1_8(int *a) {
	b = a;
	a = a+10;
     b[0] = 1*a[1] + 2*a[2] + 3*a[3] +  4*a[4] .... 7*a[7];
     b[1] = 0*a[0] + 1*a[2] + 2*a[3] .... 6*a[7];
 ..
 ..
     b[7] =  0*a[0] + ... + 1*a[7];
}