* If `g77 -v' is "fixed"...
@ 1998-06-25 9:24 Craig Burley
1998-06-25 18:53 ` Alex Buell
1998-06-28 2:05 ` Jeffrey A Law
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Craig Burley @ 1998-06-25 9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: law; +Cc: egcs
...to report its "full" version info, by reverting HJ Lu's patch
of a few days ago, then I believe it is also necessary to fix
gcc/testsuite/lib/g77.exp
to supply the appropriate `-Bpathname/' option (before -v), where
pathname is the same as in the command `pathname/g77 -v' as is
currently invoked.
IMO, this change should be made for all situations where -v is
used to get version info, to ensure the right copy of the `specs'
file gets picked up.
I don't know enough about the language these files are written
in (`expect', presumably) to fix these myself.
tq vm, (burley)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: If `g77 -v' is "fixed"...
1998-06-25 9:24 If `g77 -v' is "fixed" Craig Burley
@ 1998-06-25 18:53 ` Alex Buell
1998-06-26 9:06 ` Craig Burley
1998-06-28 2:05 ` Jeffrey A Law
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alex Buell @ 1998-06-25 18:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Craig Burley; +Cc: egcs
On Thu, 25 Jun 1998, Craig Burley wrote:
> ...to report its "full" version info, by reverting HJ Lu's patch
> of a few days ago, then I believe it is also necessary to fix
>
> gcc/testsuite/lib/g77.exp
I just noticed that g77 -v reports itself as 'gcc'. Shouldn't it be g77?
Cheers,
Alex
--
/\_/\ Legalise cannabis now!
( o.o ) Smoke some cannabis today!
> ^ < Peace, Love, Unity and Respect to all.
http://www.tahallah.demon.co.uk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: If `g77 -v' is "fixed"...
1998-06-25 18:53 ` Alex Buell
@ 1998-06-26 9:06 ` Craig Burley
1998-06-26 13:32 ` Alex Buell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Craig Burley @ 1998-06-26 9:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alex.buell; +Cc: egcs
>I just noticed that g77 -v reports itself as 'gcc'. Shouldn't it be g77?
It reports as `g77' on my screen, though the containing gcc driver
code than reports itself as `gcc'. (This is unrelated to whether
HJ Lu's patch to inhibit traditional operation of `g77 -v' is
installed, BTW.)
tq vm, (burley)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: If `g77 -v' is "fixed"...
1998-06-26 9:06 ` Craig Burley
@ 1998-06-26 13:32 ` Alex Buell
1998-06-26 17:47 ` Craig Burley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alex Buell @ 1998-06-26 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Craig Burley; +Cc: Linux-Egcs
On Fri, 26 Jun 1998, Craig Burley wrote:
> >I just noticed that g77 -v reports itself as 'gcc'. Shouldn't it be g77?
>
> It reports as `g77' on my screen, though the containing gcc driver
> code than reports itself as `gcc'. (This is unrelated to whether
> HJ Lu's patch to inhibit traditional operation of `g77 -v' is
> installed, BTW.)
g77 -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-pc-linux-gnu/egcs-2.90.29/specs
gcc version egcs-2.90.29 980515 (egcs-1.0.3 release)
This is what I get!
Cheers,
Alex
--
/\_/\ Legalise cannabis now!
( o.o ) Smoke some cannabis today!
> ^ < Peace, Love, Unity and Respect to all.
http://www.tahallah.demon.co.uk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: If `g77 -v' is "fixed"...
1998-06-26 13:32 ` Alex Buell
@ 1998-06-26 17:47 ` Craig Burley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Craig Burley @ 1998-06-26 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alex.buell; +Cc: egcs
>On Fri, 26 Jun 1998, Craig Burley wrote:
>
>> >I just noticed that g77 -v reports itself as 'gcc'. Shouldn't it be g77?
>>
>> It reports as `g77' on my screen, though the containing gcc driver
>> code than reports itself as `gcc'. (This is unrelated to whether
>> HJ Lu's patch to inhibit traditional operation of `g77 -v' is
>> installed, BTW.)
>
>g77 -v
>Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-pc-linux-gnu/egcs-2.90.29/specs
>gcc version egcs-2.90.29 980515 (egcs-1.0.3 release)
>
>This is what I get!
Oh, I didn't realize you were using egcs 1.0.3. `g77 -v' acts
more like g77 0.5.2[0123] etc. in egcs now, which should be how
it works when 1.1 is released. The other drivers (g++ etc.)
might or might not be changed to be more like g77.
tq vm, (burley)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: If `g77 -v' is "fixed"...
1998-06-25 9:24 If `g77 -v' is "fixed" Craig Burley
1998-06-25 18:53 ` Alex Buell
@ 1998-06-28 2:05 ` Jeffrey A Law
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrey A Law @ 1998-06-28 2:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Craig Burley; +Cc: egcs
In message < 199806251623.MAA12054@melange.gnu.org >you write:
> ...to report its "full" version info, by reverting HJ Lu's patch
> of a few days ago, then I believe it is also necessary to fix
>
> gcc/testsuite/lib/g77.exp
>
> to supply the appropriate `-Bpathname/' option (before -v), where
> pathname is the same as in the command `pathname/g77 -v' as is
> currently invoked.
>
> IMO, this change should be made for all situations where -v is
> used to get version info, to ensure the right copy of the `specs'
> file gets picked up.
>
> I don't know enough about the language these files are written
> in (`expect', presumably) to fix these myself.
I don't know tcl all that well either. I managed to hammer g77.exp
into submission though.
Unfortunately we have to use a totally different interface to get the
compiler to run with all the magic flags. And that interface returns
the output from the compile in a different manner too. Ugh.
Anyway, I think it'll start reporting stuff now. I only bothered to
get the version # from the driver itself. Folks with interest can
try to dig out other version information if they think it's worth the
time/effort.
jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1998-06-28 2:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1998-06-25 9:24 If `g77 -v' is "fixed" Craig Burley
1998-06-25 18:53 ` Alex Buell
1998-06-26 9:06 ` Craig Burley
1998-06-26 13:32 ` Alex Buell
1998-06-26 17:47 ` Craig Burley
1998-06-28 2:05 ` Jeffrey A Law
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).