From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alex Buell <alex.buell@tahallah.demon.co.uk>
To: Craig Burley <burley@gnu.org>
Cc: Linux-Egcs <egcs@cygnus.com>
Subject: Re: If `g77 -v' is "fixed"...
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 13:32:00 -0000
Message-id: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980626162708.16560B-100000@tahallah.demon.co.uk>
References: <199806261606.MAA12923@melange.gnu.org>
X-SW-Source: 1998-06/msg00969.html

On Fri, 26 Jun 1998, Craig Burley wrote:

> >I just noticed that g77 -v reports itself as 'gcc'. Shouldn't it be g77?
> 
> It reports as `g77' on my screen, though the containing gcc driver
> code than reports itself as `gcc'.  (This is unrelated to whether
> HJ Lu's patch to inhibit traditional operation of `g77 -v' is
> installed, BTW.)

g77 -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-pc-linux-gnu/egcs-2.90.29/specs
gcc version egcs-2.90.29 980515 (egcs-1.0.3 release)

This is what I get!

Cheers,
Alex
--
 /\_/\  Legalise cannabis now! 
( o.o ) Smoke some cannabis today!
 > ^ <  Peace, Love, Unity and Respect to all.

http://www.tahallah.demon.co.uk