From: Pieter Nagel <pnagel@epiuse.co.za>
To: egcs@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: New STL implementation from SGI
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1998 06:04:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980710103559.18309h-100000@basilisk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <199807100002.RAA10346@atrus.synopsys.com>
On Thu, 9 Jul 1998, Joe Buck wrote:
> Actually I suspect that the SGI version will be slower as well as require
> more memory in some applications: if copying strings from place to place
> is common, but concatenation is less common,
Ouch! I've been happily using strings to pass around megabyte-sized
blobs of data, but reading about the SGI string class makes me want
to run and reread the spec to check on how portable my use is - I
thought C++ strings were *supposed* to have reference countng
semantics.
I'm all for including different implementations of the string class.
How about renaming basic_string to shallow_copy_basic_string and
deep_copy_basic_string respectively, and then have a mechanism to
choose which one is typedefed to basic_string - thereby allowing one
to write code that uses *both*?
--
,_
/_) /| /
/ i e t e r / |/ a g e l
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-07-10 6:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-07-02 7:08 Peter Simons
1998-07-06 4:08 ` Jeffrey A Law
1998-07-06 8:09 ` H.J. Lu
1998-07-06 14:48 ` Jeffrey A Law
1998-07-06 22:11 ` Ben Scherrey
1998-07-07 0:14 ` Jeffrey A Law
[not found] ` <6669.899795405.cygnus.egcs@hurl.cygnus.com>
1998-07-08 16:34 ` Nathan Myers
1998-07-06 18:52 ` Alex Buell
1998-07-07 5:29 ` Carlo Wood
1998-07-07 10:14 ` B. James Phillippe
1998-07-07 12:51 ` Martin von Loewis
1998-07-07 22:54 ` H.J. Lu
1998-07-08 9:58 ` Joe Buck
[not found] ` <199807081547.IAA06604.cygnus.egcs@atrus.synopsys.com>
1998-07-09 11:18 ` Ulrich Drepper
1998-07-09 17:02 ` Joe Buck
1998-07-09 17:40 ` Ulrich Drepper
1998-07-10 6:04 ` Pieter Nagel [this message]
1998-07-10 13:32 ` Joe Buck
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.3.96.980710103559.18309h-100000.cygnus.egcs@basilisk>
1998-07-10 20:04 ` Nathan Myers
[not found] ` <199807100002.RAA10346.cygnus.egcs@atrus.synopsys.com>
1998-07-10 16:49 ` Nathan Myers
1998-07-07 1:12 ` Joe Buck
1998-07-06 18:10 ` H.J. Lu
1998-07-07 7:59 ` auto_ptr, new warning? (was: New STL implementation from SGI) Carlo Wood
1998-07-07 13:05 ` Joe Buck
[not found] <x7sokk1h55.fsf.cygnus.egcs@peti.gmd.de>
1998-07-02 15:15 ` New STL implementation from SGI Nathan Myers
1998-07-03 12:21 ` Andi Kleen
1998-07-05 15:40 ` Martin von Loewis
[not found] ` <k2d8bm4x5k.fsf.cygnus.egcs@zero.aec.at>
1998-07-05 19:46 ` Nathan Myers
1998-07-08 3:16 ` Gerald Pfeifer
1998-07-08 16:34 ` Branko Cibej
1998-07-07 22:54 Josh Stern
1998-07-11 6:31 Josh Stern
1998-07-13 1:48 Ross Smith
1998-07-13 8:40 ` Thomas Kunert
1998-07-13 15:28 ` Joe Buck
1998-07-13 17:29 Mike Stump
1998-07-13 17:29 Mike Stump
1998-07-14 8:41 ` Joe Buck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.3.96.980710103559.18309h-100000@basilisk \
--to=pnagel@epiuse.co.za \
--cc=egcs@cygnus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).