From: Stephen L Moshier <moshier@mediaone.net>
To: craig@jcb-sc.com
Cc: Peter.Bienstman@rug.ac.be, egcs@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: performance of complex arithmetic
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 13:45:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.05.9901271638380.23670-100000@moshier.ne.mediaone.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19990127210652.4169.qmail@deer>
On 27 Jan 1999 craig@jcb-sc.com wrote:
> There are still bugs in the back end, I believe, leading to the
> generation of incorrect code is `-fno-emulate-complex' is specified
> when compiling using g77.
I don't think anyone is addressing this, except for the problems with
single precision complex on 64-bit machines. Please post test cases
if you have them.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Stephen L Moshier <moshier@mediaone.net>
To: craig@jcb-sc.com
Cc: Peter.Bienstman@rug.ac.be, egcs@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: performance of complex arithmetic
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 23:58:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.05.9901271638380.23670-100000@moshier.ne.mediaone.net> (raw)
Message-ID: <19990131235800.Ku8p9fqMulXZNO_OL8DOtgHH_hFLT9osGaTpOv-O0zo@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19990127210652.4169.qmail@deer>
On 27 Jan 1999 craig@jcb-sc.com wrote:
> There are still bugs in the back end, I believe, leading to the
> generation of incorrect code is `-fno-emulate-complex' is specified
> when compiling using g77.
I don't think anyone is addressing this, except for the problems with
single precision complex on 64-bit machines. Please post test cases
if you have them.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-01-27 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-01-26 19:24 Stephen L Moshier
1999-01-27 0:33 ` Michael Hayes
1999-01-27 0:50 ` performance of complex arithmetic [gremlins] Michael Hayes
1999-01-31 23:58 ` Michael Hayes
1999-01-31 23:58 ` performance of complex arithmetic Michael Hayes
1999-01-27 1:37 ` Peter Bienstman
1999-01-27 9:25 ` Stephen L Moshier
1999-01-27 9:55 ` Joe Buck
1999-01-31 23:58 ` Joe Buck
1999-01-31 23:58 ` Stephen L Moshier
1999-01-27 13:24 ` craig
1999-01-27 13:45 ` Stephen L Moshier [this message]
1999-01-31 23:58 ` Stephen L Moshier
1999-01-31 23:58 ` craig
1999-01-31 23:58 ` Peter Bienstman
1999-01-31 23:58 ` Stephen L Moshier
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1999-01-27 14:00 Billinghurst, David (RTD)
1999-01-31 23:58 ` Billinghurst, David (RTD)
1999-01-26 1:08 Peter Bienstman
1999-01-27 6:28 ` Toon Moene
1999-01-31 23:58 ` Toon Moene
1999-01-31 23:58 ` Peter Bienstman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.05.9901271638380.23670-100000@moshier.ne.mediaone.net \
--to=moshier@mediaone.net \
--cc=Peter.Bienstman@rug.ac.be \
--cc=craig@jcb-sc.com \
--cc=egcs@cygnus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).