public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manush Dodunekov <manush@litecom.se>
To: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@dcc.unicamp.br>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: possible bug
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 03:27:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9907271221020.7382-100000@pulse.litecom.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <orwvvnpa4u.fsf@cacau.lsd.dcc.unicamp.br>

On 26 Jul 1999, Alexandre Oliva wrote:

> On Jul 25, 1999, Manush Dodunekov <manush@litecom.se> wrote:
> 
> > The code below compiles fine with no flags, but fails to compile with a
> > parse error on the line containing "iterator i;" when compiling with
> > -pedantic.
> 
> That's correct.  Members of template-dependent base classes must be
> explicitly qualified.  Without -pedantic, gcc accepts it as an
> extension.

However, using 
	vector<T>::iterator i;
doesn't help the compile; It only compiles when using 
	typename vector<T>::iterator i;
What does the standard say on this? Shouldn't the first case be enough?

regards,
Manush

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Manush Dodunekov <manush@litecom.se>
To: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@dcc.unicamp.br>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: possible bug
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 23:33:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9907271221020.7382-100000@pulse.litecom.net> (raw)
Message-ID: <19990731233300.AQ5OX0lnyV-hpwMmzHYu5RbiWxzAOzUoeC_wQItXYac@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <orwvvnpa4u.fsf@cacau.lsd.dcc.unicamp.br>

On 26 Jul 1999, Alexandre Oliva wrote:

> On Jul 25, 1999, Manush Dodunekov <manush@litecom.se> wrote:
> 
> > The code below compiles fine with no flags, but fails to compile with a
> > parse error on the line containing "iterator i;" when compiling with
> > -pedantic.
> 
> That's correct.  Members of template-dependent base classes must be
> explicitly qualified.  Without -pedantic, gcc accepts it as an
> extension.

However, using 
	vector<T>::iterator i;
doesn't help the compile; It only compiles when using 
	typename vector<T>::iterator i;
What does the standard say on this? Shouldn't the first case be enough?

regards,
Manush

  reply	other threads:[~1999-07-27  3:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1999-07-25 17:52 Manush Dodunekov
1999-07-26 10:57 ` Alexandre Oliva
1999-07-27  3:27   ` Manush Dodunekov [this message]
1999-07-27  3:37     ` Alexandre Oliva
1999-07-31 23:33       ` Alexandre Oliva
1999-07-31 23:33     ` Manush Dodunekov
1999-07-31 23:33   ` Alexandre Oliva
1999-07-31 23:33 ` Manush Dodunekov
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-03-26 20:28 Possible Bug Nathan Boley
2011-03-27  7:38 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2011-03-28 11:06   ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-03-28 11:28     ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-28 11:47       ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-03-28 12:14         ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-28 13:37         ` Michael Matz
2011-03-28 13:54           ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-03-28 14:37             ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-29 16:03               ` Nathan Boley
2003-01-31  0:33 possible bug Andrew Morton
2003-01-31  0:36 ` Jan Hubicka
2003-01-31  0:56   ` Andrew Morton
2003-01-31  8:08   ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-01-31 10:48     ` Fergus Henderson
1997-12-12 15:46 Possible Bug Mike Sullivan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.10.9907271221020.7382-100000@pulse.litecom.net \
    --to=manush@litecom.se \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=oliva@dcc.unicamp.br \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).