Successful Build of GCC 3.0.1

Successful Build of GCC 3.0.1

[Shannon Koh]

Hi,

I'm running WinLinux 2001 (currently identified as i386-redhat-linux-gnu),
which I've obtained from http://www.winlinux.net , and have successfully
built GCC 3.0.1 today.


Shannon

Re: Successful Build of GCC 3.0.1

[Janis Johnson]

On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 12:05:05PM +1000, Shannon Koh wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm running WinLinux 2001 (currently identified as i386-redhat-linux-gnu),
> which I've obtained from http://www.winlinux.net , and have successfully
> built GCC 3.0.1 today.

Thanks!  I've added "i386-redhat-linux-gnu" to the GCC 3.0 build status
page at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.0/buildstat.html .

Janis

Re: Successful Build of GCC 3.0.1

[Joe Buck]

> On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 12:05:05PM +1000, Shannon Koh wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I'm running WinLinux 2001 (currently identified as i386-redhat-linux-gnu),
> > which I've obtained from http://www.winlinux.net , and have successfully
> > built GCC 3.0.1 today.
> 
> Thanks!  I've added "i386-redhat-linux-gnu" to the GCC 3.0 build status
> page at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.0/buildstat.html .

You'll need to add more than that, Janet, since this system does not
correctly identify itself (it is not Red Hat, it is "WinLinux").

Re: Successful Build of GCC 3.0.1

[Joe Buck]

I wrote 
> You'll need to add more than that, Janet,

Sigh.  s/Janet/Janis/.  I apologize.

Re: Successful Build of GCC 3.0.1

[Janis Johnson]

On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 11:14:18AM -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 12:05:05PM +1000, Shannon Koh wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I'm running WinLinux 2001 (currently identified as i386-redhat-linux-gnu),
> > > which I've obtained from http://www.winlinux.net , and have successfully
> > > built GCC 3.0.1 today.
> > 
> > Thanks!  I've added "i386-redhat-linux-gnu" to the GCC 3.0 build status
> > page at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.0/buildstat.html .
> 
> You'll need to add more than that, [Janis], since this system does not
> correctly identify itself (it is not Red Hat, it is "WinLinux").
> 
In further mail with Joe he recommended that entries for Linux specify
the distribution name and version and also the version of glibc that
was used.  I've added the information that I could find in the mail
archives.  If the lists for some targets get too long I'll split them
into separate entries.

I'll submit a patch to install.texi to ask users reporting successful
builds on Linux to include the additional information.

Janis

Index: buildstat.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-3.0/buildstat.html,v
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u -r1.29 buildstat.html
--- buildstat.html	2001/09/19 16:48:29	1.29
+++ buildstat.html	2001/09/21 22:39:52
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
 
 <tr>
 <td>alphaev56-unknown-linux-gnu</td>
-<td>Successful</td>
+<td>Successful (Red Hat 6.2)</td>
 </tr>
 
 <tr>
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@
 
 <tr>
 <td>i386-redhat-linux-gnu</td>
-<td>Successful</td>
+<td>Successful (WinLinux 2001)</td>
 </tr>
 
 <tr>
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@
 
 <tr>
 <td>i686-pc-linux-gnu</td>
-<td>Successful</td>
+<td>Successful (Red Hat 6.2; Red Hat 7.1)</td>
 </tr>
 
 <tr>
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@
 
 <tr>
 <td>sparc-linux-gnu</td>
-<td>Successful</td>
+<td>Successful (Debian)</td>
 </tr>
 
 <tr>