From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25461 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2003 22:14:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25454 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2003 22:14:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.kloo.net) (63.192.214.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Aug 2003 22:14:43 -0000 Received: by mail.kloo.net (Postfix, from userid 504) id 6A1E83B0308; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:03:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kloo.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 658FC3B4176; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:03:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 22:49:00 -0000 From: To: Mark Hahn Cc: Robert Dewar , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: std::pow implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00235.txt.bz2 On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Mark Hahn wrote: > > pretty hard to do for the great majority of C++ (or Ada for that matter) > > programmers who have not the slightest awareness of machine language or > > its implications. > > so since some programmers are imperfect, > none of them should get nice sharp tools? please, no! > > C/C++, at least, have never shied from enough-rope features. > > regards, mark hahn. > >