From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32599 invoked by alias); 26 Apr 2002 17:26:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32592 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2002 17:26:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nondot.org) (64.5.103.85) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Apr 2002 17:26:01 -0000 Received: by nondot.org (Postfix, from userid 501) id 8615E11883; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 12:22:54 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nondot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81FC31183E; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 12:22:54 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 10:30:00 -0000 From: Chris Lattner To: Kris Warkentin Cc: Subject: Re: pure and const functions In-Reply-To: <022e01c1ed46$c417c3f0$b6010c0a@catdog> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01430.txt.bz2 > One that calls a longjmp() or does an exec()? But those presumably would not be pure or const, would they? -Chris http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/os/ http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/