public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* When will the next version be out
@ 2001-07-11 13:47 David Rasmussen
  2001-07-11 15:45 ` Joe Buck
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: David Rasmussen @ 2001-07-11 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gcc@Gcc. Gnu. Org

There have been a couple of pretty important bugfixes since 3.0 came out.
When is the next release scheduled? Is it normal to have the version
following a big release (such as 3.0) come quicker (because of more
potential bugs etc.) than otherwise?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: When will the next version be out
  2001-07-11 13:47 When will the next version be out David Rasmussen
@ 2001-07-11 15:45 ` Joe Buck
  2001-07-11 16:00   ` David Rasmussen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joe Buck @ 2001-07-11 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Rasmussen; +Cc: Gcc@Gcc. Gnu. Org

> There have been a couple of pretty important bugfixes since 3.0 came out.
> When is the next release scheduled? Is it normal to have the version
> following a big release (such as 3.0) come quicker (because of more
> potential bugs etc.) than otherwise?

There will be a 3.0.1 in the near future, and yes, it is normal that
a bug fix release shortly follows the major release.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* RE: When will the next version be out
  2001-07-11 15:45 ` Joe Buck
@ 2001-07-11 16:00   ` David Rasmussen
  2001-07-11 17:30     ` Joe Buck
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: David Rasmussen @ 2001-07-11 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joe Buck; +Cc: Gcc@Gcc. Gnu. Org

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Buck [ mailto:jbuck@synopsys.COM ]
> Sent: 12. juli 2001 00:45
> To: David Rasmussen
> Cc: Gcc@Gcc. Gnu. Org
> Subject: Re: When will the next version be out
>
>
>
> > There have been a couple of pretty important bugfixes since 3.0
> came out.
> > When is the next release scheduled? Is it normal to have the version
> > following a big release (such as 3.0) come quicker (because of more
> > potential bugs etc.) than otherwise?
>
> There will be a 3.0.1 in the near future, and yes, it is normal that
> a bug fix release shortly follows the major release.
>
>

Cool. I hope I'm not annoying, but when is "the near future"? A week? A
month?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: When will the next version be out
  2001-07-11 16:00   ` David Rasmussen
@ 2001-07-11 17:30     ` Joe Buck
  2001-07-11 17:40       ` Joseph S. Myers
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joe Buck @ 2001-07-11 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Rasmussen; +Cc: Joe Buck, Gcc@Gcc. Gnu. Org

> > There will be a 3.0.1 in the near future, and yes, it is normal that
> > a bug fix release shortly follows the major release.

> Cool. I hope I'm not annoying, but when is "the near future"? A week? A
> month?

Probably somewhere in between, but that's not a promise, just an educated
guess.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: When will the next version be out
  2001-07-11 17:30     ` Joe Buck
@ 2001-07-11 17:40       ` Joseph S. Myers
  2001-07-12  9:14         ` PATCH for " Gerald Pfeifer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joseph S. Myers @ 2001-07-11 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joe Buck; +Cc: David Rasmussen, Gcc@Gcc. Gnu. Org

On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Joe Buck wrote:

> Probably somewhere in between, but that's not a promise, just an educated
> guess.

Given that we have a schedule

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-06/msg01382.html

perhaps we should link to it from the home page.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* PATCH for Re: When will the next version be out
  2001-07-11 17:40       ` Joseph S. Myers
@ 2001-07-12  9:14         ` Gerald Pfeifer
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Gerald Pfeifer @ 2001-07-12  9:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joseph S. Myers; +Cc: Joe Buck, David Rasmussen, gcc, gcc-patches

On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> Given that we have a schedule
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-06/msg01382.html
>
> perhaps we should link to it from the home page.

Yup. Installed.

Gerald

Index: index.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/index.html,v
retrieving revision 1.254
diff -u -3 -p -r1.254 index.html
--- index.html	2001/07/02 14:50:10	1.254
+++ index.html	2001/07/12 16:13:19
@@ -136,7 +136,9 @@ GNU/Linux) and cross targets and use an
 <a href=" http://gcc.gnu.org/testresults/" ;>test suite</a> as well as a
 <a href=" http://gcc.gnu.org/benchresults/" ;>benchmark suite</a> to
 maintain and improve quality.
-<a href="gcc-3.0/gcc-3.0.html">GCC 3.0</a> is the current release.
+<a href="gcc-3.0/gcc-3.0.html">GCC 3.0</a> is the current release,
+<a href=" http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-06/msg01382.html" ;>GCC 3.0.1 is
+schedule for early August</a>.
 </p>

 <hr>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2001-07-12  9:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-07-11 13:47 When will the next version be out David Rasmussen
2001-07-11 15:45 ` Joe Buck
2001-07-11 16:00   ` David Rasmussen
2001-07-11 17:30     ` Joe Buck
2001-07-11 17:40       ` Joseph S. Myers
2001-07-12  9:14         ` PATCH for " Gerald Pfeifer

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).