From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4336 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2001 15:04:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2506 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2001 15:03:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cam029208.student.utwente.nl) (130.89.224.138) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Dec 2001 15:03:07 -0000 Received: from localhost (caligula@localhost) by cam029208.student.utwente.nl (8.11.6/linuxconf) with ESMTP id fB7F1KX06513 for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 16:01:20 +0100 Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 07:52:00 -0000 From: Gcc k6 testing account To: Subject: Build status page:Succes and failures. Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00364.txt.bz2 Ave gcc people. I'm following the build status page discussion and here are my 2 cents. When 3.0.2 was released I reported a succesfull build on k6-redhat-linux-gnu and submitted the testresults with test_summary.(October 24). Following this discussion,I tried to build 3.0 and 3.0.1. Those bootstraps were NOT succesfull. So here's the summary on the k6 side. gcc-3.0 -->No bootstrap. gcc-3.0.1 -->No bootstrap. gcc-3.0.2 -->Succsesfull bootstrap. gcc-3.0.x-cvs -->Succesfull bootstrap. gcc-3.1-cvs -->Succesfull bootstrap. All this with: gcc : 2.96-97 binutils : 2.11.90.0.8 glibc : 2.2.4 So maybe there could be a warning note on the build status page that k6-redhat-linux-gnu bootstraps succesfully from 3.0.2 on. Just like s390-linux-gnu starts to bootstrap from 3.0.1 on. Greetinx Martijn Uffing (please only reply to the list. This is a send only email-account)