From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
To: <dewar@gnat.com>
Cc: <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: ACATS legal status cleared by FSF
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 15:55:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112092307040.30551-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011209230207.BB23CF28F3@nile.gnat.com>
On Sun, 9 Dec 2001 dewar@gnat.com wrote:
> I actually think that by far the most valuable addition to the C tests would
> be to add some of the tests from the ACT test suite that ACT wrote, and that
> are therefore potentially available. As soon as we have the tree issues
> fully under control (most notably the docuemntation is still a real issue),
> we will send some of these tests along.
Also, once we have a test harness for ordinary Ada tests similar to the
harnesses for other languages, contributing a test case for every change
ACT make unless there's some reason you can't (e.g. the harness doesn't
support it, or attempts to create a nonconfidential test case for a
problem shown up in confidential code fail), following the normal
requirements for contributing to GCC. This way a useful test suite can
continue to be built up over time.
(This applies both to front end changes, and to changes to the rest of GCC
to fix problems shown up by Ada test cases.)
--
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-09 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-09 15:06 dewar
2001-12-09 15:55 ` Joseph S. Myers [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-12-09 19:03 dewar
2001-12-09 14:00 dewar
2001-12-07 19:12 dewar
2001-12-09 13:02 ` Zack Weinberg
2001-12-09 14:52 ` guerby
2001-12-09 19:47 ` Geert Bosch
2001-12-07 18:57 dewar
2001-12-07 18:50 mike stump
2001-12-07 17:59 dewar
2001-12-07 3:18 Richard Kenner
2001-12-06 19:09 dewar
2001-12-06 17:38 dewar
2001-12-06 15:40 Richard Kenner
2001-12-06 15:01 Richard Kenner
2001-12-05 23:36 dewar
2001-12-05 15:28 Richard Kenner
2001-12-05 15:41 ` guerby
2001-12-05 15:13 guerby
2001-12-05 16:21 ` Joseph S. Myers
2001-12-05 18:00 ` Jerry van Dijk
2001-12-06 3:36 ` Geoff Keating
2001-12-06 9:34 ` Geert Bosch
2001-12-06 11:48 ` Zack Weinberg
2001-12-06 14:24 ` Geert Bosch
2001-12-06 14:32 ` Joseph S. Myers
2001-12-06 15:10 ` Zack Weinberg
2001-12-06 15:41 ` Geert Bosch
2001-12-06 18:22 ` Zack Weinberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.33.0112092307040.30551-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk \
--to=jsm28@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=dewar@gnat.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).