From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25358 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2002 17:56:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25256 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2002 17:56:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO purple.csi.cam.ac.uk) (131.111.8.4) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Apr 2002 17:56:47 -0000 Received: from student.cusu.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.179.82] helo=kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk ident=mail) by purple.csi.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.04) id 170R0U-0001UK-00; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 18:56:42 +0100 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 170R0U-0000zO-00; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 18:56:42 +0100 Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 11:03:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" X-X-Sender: To: Mark Mitchell cc: Kurt Wall , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: GCC 3.1 prerelease In-Reply-To: <64050000.1019666102@gandalf.codesourcery.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01254.txt.bz2 On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Mark Mitchell wrote: > No, it's a matter of the release script not generating either. Probably > the md5 checksums lying around with the gzips are out of date. > > I'll try to add this to the release script. The MD5 sums are I think generated by some process that runs on gcc.gnu.org and generates them for new FTP files. I don't know the details - this isn't documented at . It would be better for actual releases to be cryptographically signed. -- Joseph S. Myers jsm28@cam.ac.uk