public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
To: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>
Cc: <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2?
Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2002 05:40:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0207061139170.13046-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <u8k7ob78p1.fsf@gromit.moeb>

On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Andreas Jaeger wrote:

> What will this mean for distributions and for production usage of GCC
> 3.1?  I fear this means that folks cannot easily upgrade from GCC 3.1
> to GCC 3.2 since C++ is incompatible and all C++ libraries that are
> needed for development need to be relinked.

Where does libstdc++ fit into this?  Is libstdc++ yet ready to be binary
compatible between successive major releases?  If not, how useful is
binary compatibility of the underlying C++ ABI?

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-07-06 10:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-04  9:55 Andreas Jaeger
2002-07-04 10:23 ` H. J. Lu
2002-07-05 14:17 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-07-05 14:22   ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-07-05 14:28     ` Mark Mitchell
2002-07-05 14:53       ` David O'Brien
2002-07-05 15:08         ` Mark Mitchell
2002-07-06  5:34           ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-07-06  6:40             ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-07-06  6:40               ` Jakub Jelinek
2002-07-06  7:20                 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-07-06  7:53                   ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-07-06  8:54                     ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-07-06 11:04                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-07-06  7:42                 ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-07-06 11:08                   ` Jeff Law
2002-07-06 11:10                     ` Gwenole Beauchesne
2002-07-06  6:19         ` Daniel Egger
2002-07-05 14:46   ` David O'Brien
2002-07-05 15:02     ` H. J. Lu
2002-07-05 15:12       ` David O'Brien
2002-07-05 15:20         ` H. J. Lu
2002-07-05 16:11           ` Stan Shebs
2002-07-05 16:12             ` David Edelsohn
2002-07-05 16:35               ` Stan Shebs
2002-07-05 22:18               ` Geoff Keating
2002-07-07 23:14               ` Mark Mitchell
2002-07-05 15:02     ` Mark Mitchell
2002-07-06  6:28       ` Scott Robert Ladd
2002-07-06  4:56     ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-07-06  6:44       ` Gerald Pfeifer
2002-07-06  7:35         ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-07-06 11:44         ` David O'Brien
2002-07-05 22:35 ` David Edelsohn
2002-07-06  5:40 ` Joseph S. Myers [this message]
2002-07-06  6:40   ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-07-06  7:49     ` Andreas Jaeger
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-07-10  4:24 Iain McClatchie
2002-07-08 10:09 Ben Woodhead
2002-07-08  9:02 Bernard Dautrevaux
2002-07-08 13:03 ` Bernard Dautrevaux
2002-07-10  7:32 ` Bernard Dautrevaux
2002-07-12  3:09 ` Bernard Dautrevaux
2002-07-12 13:50 ` Bernard Dautrevaux
2002-07-08  3:42 Bernard Dautrevaux
2002-07-08  4:07 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-07-08  6:28 ` Joern Rennecke
2002-07-08 13:05 ` Bernard Dautrevaux
2002-07-10  7:33 ` Bernard Dautrevaux
2002-07-12  4:27 ` Bernard Dautrevaux
2002-07-12 13:53 ` Bernard Dautrevaux
2002-07-06 15:47 Joern Rennecke
2002-07-06 16:09 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-07-07  8:03   ` Joern Rennecke
     [not found] <3900A36C.18989ED4@apple.com>
2000-04-21 17:17 ` [patch] beginnings of the macro rewrite Horst von Brand
2000-04-22 10:33   ` Zack Weinberg
2000-04-22 20:13     ` Marc Espie
2000-04-22 20:20     ` Neil Booth
2000-04-24  8:57     ` Michael Meissner
2000-04-24 17:54       ` Russ Allbery
2000-04-27 15:54     ` Philipp Thomas
2000-04-27 17:32       ` Joe Buck
2000-04-24 23:38   ` Martin Kahlert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.33.0207061139170.13046-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk \
    --to=jsm28@cam.ac.uk \
    --cc=aj@suse.de \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).