From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-57115-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 5071 invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2002 09:56:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5039 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2002 09:56:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO Cantor.suse.de) (213.95.15.193)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Jul 2002 09:56:19 -0000
Received: from Hermes.suse.de (Charybdis.suse.de [213.95.15.201])
	by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BE4EB14602; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 11:56:18 +0200 (MEST)
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 09:15:00 -0000
From: Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>
To: Brad Lucier <lucier@math.purdue.edu>
Cc: <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: curiosity about new-regalloc-branch
In-Reply-To: <200207250448.g6P4mgN00862@banach.math.purdue.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0207251153000.22087-100000@wotan.suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg01204.txt.bz2

Hi,

On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Brad Lucier wrote:

> I noted that things are still being checked into the
> new-regalloc-branch, e.g.,
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2002-07/msg00580.html
>
> and I'm curious---since the new register allocator has been integrated
> into the mainline, should these changes go into the mainline, too?

Only those parts remotely finished were checked into mainline, to give
them larger exposure/testing.  Work is still continuing on the branch.
You don't want to fiddle with reload on mainline in the scale we plan ;-)


Ciao,
Michael.