From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25568 invoked by alias); 15 Oct 2002 00:36:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25560 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2002 00:35:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO maroon.csi.cam.ac.uk) (131.111.8.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Oct 2002 00:35:59 -0000 Received: from student.cusu.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.179.82] helo=kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk ident=mail) by maroon.csi.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 181Fgk-0005YP-00; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 01:35:58 +0100 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 181Fgk-0002OC-00; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 01:35:58 +0100 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 19:13:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" X-X-Sender: To: "H. J. Lu" cc: , GNU C Library Subject: Re: C ABI changes between gcc 2.96 and gcc 3.2? In-Reply-To: <20021014170206.A3933@lucon.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00768.txt.bz2 On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, H. J. Lu wrote: > Is that a known issue? I guess I can extract a testcase out of it. I > think it may impact people who try to use gcc 2.96 with glibc compiled > with gcc 3.2. This would be the broken in 2.9x. An untested patch for that is at (without the removal of the configure test for that should accompany it). Unless glibc uses or used this is irrelevant to glibc. -- Joseph S. Myers jsm28@cam.ac.uk