From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17957 invoked by alias); 29 Dec 2002 22:24:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17950 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2002 22:24:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rose.csi.cam.ac.uk) (131.111.8.13) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 29 Dec 2002 22:24:11 -0000 Received: from student.cusu.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.179.82] helo=kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk ident=mail) by rose.csi.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18Slqf-0001Fq-00; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 22:23:57 +0000 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18Slqf-0005VX-00; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 22:23:57 +0000 Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 00:12:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" X-X-Sender: To: Gerald Pfeifer cc: Nick Burrett , Zack Weinberg , Subject: Re: Target deprecation, round two In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg01557.txt.bz2 On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Zack, I believe we should send target deprecation notes also to the > gcc-announce list, not just gcc (We cannot assume everyone interested > in GCC always reads the gcc list, I suppose). Once a provisional list has been agreed, yes (considering that a message was sent to gcc-announce for removal of support files for the systems that had only ever worked in GCC 1). We could start with a list of the systems that were obsoleted in 3.1 and removed in 3.3, and of the systems obsoleted in 3.3 that will be removed in 3.4 in the absence of any interest, then follow up with an agreed list of those to be obsoleted in 3.4. -- Joseph S. Myers jsm28@cam.ac.uk