From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29388 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2002 10:42:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29377 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2002 10:42:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO thinkpad.c0202001.roe.itnq.net) (217.112.132.138) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Dec 2002 10:42:35 -0000 Received: from karel (helo=localhost) by thinkpad.c0202001.roe.itnq.net with local-esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18MnGJ-0000J2-00 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 11:41:43 +0100 Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 04:04:00 -0000 From: Karel Gardas X-X-Sender: karel@thinkpad.c0202001.roe.itnq.net To: GCC Mailing List Subject: [pch-branch] missing binary operator issue. Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00712.txt.bz2 Hello, I've updated to todays pch-branch sources and try to compile MICO with this compiler. Unfortunatelly, when using PCH it fails to compile first file with: os-unix.cc:194:12: missing binary operator before token "(" os-unix.cc:243:14: missing binary operator before token "(" ../include/mico/code_set_registry.h:5: warning: `CORBA::Codeset::Info _osf_cs_reg[193]' defined but not used This file is perfectly compilable w/o using PCH with this compiler. Problematic lines look: 193 194 #if defined(HAVE_DLOPEN) && defined(HAVE_DYNAMIC) 195 and 242 243 #elif defined(HAVE_SHL_LOAD) && defined(HAVE_DYNAMIC) 244 FYI: Comeau is perfectly ok with these sources even with PCH on, so I hope they are ok from PCH point of view, but it might be a bug in gcc. Anything what should I test for you? Thanks, Karel -- Karel Gardas kgardas@objectsecurity.com ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com