* [pch-branch] missing binary operator issue.
@ 2002-12-13 4:04 Karel Gardas
2003-01-02 17:59 ` Geoff Keating
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Karel Gardas @ 2002-12-13 4:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: GCC Mailing List
Hello,
I've updated to todays pch-branch sources and try to compile MICO with
this compiler. Unfortunatelly, when using PCH it fails to compile first
file with:
os-unix.cc:194:12: missing binary operator before token "("
os-unix.cc:243:14: missing binary operator before token "("
../include/mico/code_set_registry.h:5: warning: `CORBA::Codeset::Info
_osf_cs_reg[193]' defined but not used
This file is perfectly compilable w/o using PCH with this compiler.
Problematic lines look:
193
194 #if defined(HAVE_DLOPEN) && defined(HAVE_DYNAMIC)
195
and
242
243 #elif defined(HAVE_SHL_LOAD) && defined(HAVE_DYNAMIC)
244
FYI: Comeau is perfectly ok with these sources even with PCH on, so I hope
they are ok from PCH point of view, but it might be a bug in gcc.
Anything what should I test for you?
Thanks,
Karel
--
Karel Gardas kgardas@objectsecurity.com
ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [pch-branch] missing binary operator issue. 2002-12-13 4:04 [pch-branch] missing binary operator issue Karel Gardas @ 2003-01-02 17:59 ` Geoff Keating 2003-01-02 21:26 ` Karel Gardas 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Geoff Keating @ 2003-01-02 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Karel Gardas; +Cc: gcc Karel Gardas <kgardas@objectsecurity.com> writes: > os-unix.cc:194:12: missing binary operator before token "(" > 194 #if defined(HAVE_DLOPEN) && defined(HAVE_DYNAMIC) This should now be fixed. -- - Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [pch-branch] missing binary operator issue. 2003-01-02 17:59 ` Geoff Keating @ 2003-01-02 21:26 ` Karel Gardas 2003-01-02 22:21 ` Andrew Pinski 2003-01-07 19:32 ` Geoff Keating 0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Karel Gardas @ 2003-01-02 21:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Geoff Keating; +Cc: gcc On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Geoff Keating wrote: > Karel Gardas <kgardas@objectsecurity.com> writes: > > > os-unix.cc:194:12: missing binary operator before token "(" > > > 194 #if defined(HAVE_DLOPEN) && defined(HAVE_DYNAMIC) > > This should now be fixed. > Great! But now I get: thinkpad:~/arch/devel/mico-devel/orb$ c++ -I../include -Wall -DFAST_PCH -fpermissive -DPIC -fPIC -c orb_pch.h ../include/mico/code_set_registry.h:5: warning: `CORBA::Codeset::Info _osf_cs_reg[193]' defined but not used thinkpad:~/arch/devel/mico-devel/orb$ make c++ -I../include -Wall -DFAST_PCH -fpermissive -DPIC -fPIC -c os-unix.cc -o os-unix.pic.o ../include/mico/code_set_registry.h:5: warning: `CORBA::Codeset::Info _osf_cs_reg[193]' defined but not used /tmp/cczg5mr7.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/cczg5mr7.s:2963: Error: symbol `.LCFI0' is already defined /tmp/cczg5mr7.s:2965: Error: symbol `.LCFI1' is already defined /tmp/cczg5mr7.s:2967: Error: symbol `.LCFI2' is already defined /tmp/cczg5mr7.s:2969: Error: symbol `.LCFI3' is already defined /tmp/cczg5mr7.s:2973: Error: symbol `.L2' is already defined /tmp/cczg5mr7.s:2985: Error: symbol `.L4' is already defined /tmp/cczg5mr7.s:2999: Error: symbol `.L6' is already defined /tmp/cczg5mr7.s:3033: Error: symbol `.L10' is already defined /tmp/cczg5mr7.s:3039: Error: symbol `.L11' is already defined /tmp/cczg5mr7.s:3090: Error: symbol `.L15' is already defined /tmp/cczg5mr7.s:3104: Error: symbol `.L8' is already defined /tmp/cczg5mr7.s:3125: Error: symbol `.LCFI4' is already defined /tmp/cczg5mr7.s:3127: Error: symbol `.LCFI5' is already defined /tmp/cczg5mr7.s:3129: Error: symbol `.LCFI6' is already defined /tmp/cczg5mr7.s:3131: Error: symbol `.LCFI7' is already defined /tmp/cczg5mr7.s:3155: Error: symbol `.LEHB0' is already defined /tmp/cczg5mr7.s:3157: Error: symbol `.LEHE0' is already defined /tmp/cczg5mr7.s:3173: Error: symbol `.LEHB1' is already defined /tmp/cczg5mr7.s:3181: Error: symbol `.LEHE1' is already defined /tmp/cczg5mr7.s:3214: Error: symbol `.LEHB2' is already defined /tmp/cczg5mr7.s:3216: Error: symbol `.LEHE2' is already defined make: *** [os-unix.pic.o] Error 1 thinkpad:~/arch/devel/mico-devel/orb$ BTW: IMHO something strage is with my gcc3.4-pch... the branch compiled 10-20 % slower than version which I tried before, and whole configuration process seems to be moved to build process. Is this behaviour right, or have I done something wrong? I've configured gcc with: $HOME/cvs/gcc/pch-branch/gcc/configure --prefix=$HOME/usr/local/pch-branch --enable-shared --enable-threads --enable-languages=c++ --disable-checking --enable-__cxa_atexit and build it with: time make CFLAGS='-O' LIBCFLAGS='-g -O2' LIBCXXFLAGS='-g -O2 -fno-implicit-templates' bootstrap-lean Unfortunately gcc -v said: thinkpad:~/arch/devel/mico-devel/orb$ gcc -v Reading specs from /home/karel/usr/local/pch-branch/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4-pch/specs Configured with: Thread model: posix gcc version 3.4-pch 20021218 (experimental) thinkpad:~/arch/devel/mico-devel/orb$ Anything what should I test? Thanks, Karel -- Karel Gardas kgardas@objectsecurity.com ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [pch-branch] missing binary operator issue. 2003-01-02 21:26 ` Karel Gardas @ 2003-01-02 22:21 ` Andrew Pinski 2003-01-07 19:32 ` Geoff Keating 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Andrew Pinski @ 2003-01-02 22:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Karel Gardas; +Cc: gcc On Thursday, Jan 2, 2003, at 13:25 US/Pacific, Karel Gardas wrote: > BTW: IMHO something strage is with my gcc3.4-pch... the branch compiled > 10-20 % slower than version which I tried before, and whole > configuration > process seems to be moved to build process. Is this behaviour right, or > have I done something wrong? This is because 3.4 changed how every thing is done with building gcc, It was done so to autoconfive the top-level configure and Makefile. Thanks, Andrew Pinski ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [pch-branch] missing binary operator issue. 2003-01-02 21:26 ` Karel Gardas 2003-01-02 22:21 ` Andrew Pinski @ 2003-01-07 19:32 ` Geoff Keating 2003-01-08 16:06 ` Karel Gardas 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Geoff Keating @ 2003-01-07 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: kgardas; +Cc: gcc > /tmp/cczg5mr7.s:2963: Error: symbol `.LCFI0' is already defined ... > /tmp/cczg5mr7.s:2973: Error: symbol `.L2' is already defined This patch might fix this problem. Could you test it? I know there are other problems with DWARF2 output, so I don't promise the resulting DWARF2 is correct, but it should at least assemble. It'd be good if you could provide a small test case that triggers the problem, I didn't manage to generate one. -- - Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org> ===File ~/patches/apple/pchbranch-moredwarfcounters.patch=== 2003-01-06 Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@apple.com> * dwarf2out.c (dwarf2out_cfi_label): Move label_num out of the routine and mark it for PCH. (gen_internal_sym): Likewise. Index: dwarf2out.c =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/dwarf2out.c,v retrieving revision 1.349.2.17 diff -u -p -u -p -r1.349.2.17 dwarf2out.c --- dwarf2out.c 24 Dec 2002 02:06:23 -0000 1.349.2.17 +++ dwarf2out.c 7 Jan 2003 01:30:38 -0000 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ /* Output Dwarf2 format symbol table information from the GNU C compiler. - Copyright (C) 1992, 1993, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 + Copyright (C) 1992, 1993, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Contributed by Gary Funck (gary@intrepid.com). Derived from DWARF 1 implementation of Ron Guilmette (rfg@monkeys.com). @@ -305,7 +305,11 @@ struct indirect_string_node GTY(()) static GTY ((param_is (struct indirect_string_node))) htab_t debug_str_hash; +/* Various counters for generating labels. */ + static GTY(()) int dw2_string_counter; +static GTY(()) unsigned long dwarf2out_cfi_label_counter; +static GTY(()) int gen_internal_sym_counter; #if defined (DWARF2_DEBUGGING_INFO) || defined (DWARF2_UNWIND_INFO) @@ -561,9 +565,8 @@ char * dwarf2out_cfi_label () { static char label[20]; - static unsigned long label_num = 0; - ASM_GENERATE_INTERNAL_LABEL (label, "LCFI", label_num++); + ASM_GENERATE_INTERNAL_LABEL (label, "LCFI", dwarf2out_cfi_label_counter++); ASM_OUTPUT_LABEL (asm_out_file, label); return label; } @@ -5939,9 +5942,8 @@ gen_internal_sym (prefix) const char *prefix; { char buf[256]; - static int label_num; - ASM_GENERATE_INTERNAL_LABEL (buf, prefix, label_num++); + ASM_GENERATE_INTERNAL_LABEL (buf, prefix, gen_internal_sym_counter++); return xstrdup (buf); } ============================================================ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [pch-branch] missing binary operator issue. 2003-01-07 19:32 ` Geoff Keating @ 2003-01-08 16:06 ` Karel Gardas 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Karel Gardas @ 2003-01-08 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Geoff Keating; +Cc: gcc On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Geoff Keating wrote: > > > /tmp/cczg5mr7.s:2963: Error: symbol `.LCFI0' is already defined > ... > > /tmp/cczg5mr7.s:2973: Error: symbol `.L2' is already defined > > This patch might fix this problem. Could you test it? > No it doesn't. Still I get: thinkpad:~/arch/devel/mico-devel/orb$ c++ -I../include -Wall -DFAST_PCH -fpermissive -DPIC -fPIC -c orb_pch.h ../include/mico/code_set_registry.h:5: warning: `CORBA::Codeset::Info _osf_cs_reg[193]' defined but not used thinkpad:~/arch/devel/mico-devel/orb$ thinkpad:~/arch/devel/mico-devel/orb$ make c++ -I../include -Wall -DFAST_PCH -fpermissive -DPIC -fPIC -c os-unix.cc -o os-unix.pic.o ../include/mico/code_set_registry.h:5: warning: `CORBA::Codeset::Info _osf_cs_reg[193]' defined but not used /tmp/cctHJBgN.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/cctHJBgN.s:2973: Error: symbol `.L2' is already defined /tmp/cctHJBgN.s:2985: Error: symbol `.L4' is already defined /tmp/cctHJBgN.s:2999: Error: symbol `.L6' is already defined /tmp/cctHJBgN.s:3033: Error: symbol `.L10' is already defined /tmp/cctHJBgN.s:3039: Error: symbol `.L11' is already defined /tmp/cctHJBgN.s:3090: Error: symbol `.L15' is already defined /tmp/cctHJBgN.s:3104: Error: symbol `.L8' is already defined /tmp/cctHJBgN.s:3155: Error: symbol `.LEHB0' is already defined /tmp/cctHJBgN.s:3157: Error: symbol `.LEHE0' is already defined /tmp/cctHJBgN.s:3173: Error: symbol `.LEHB1' is already defined /tmp/cctHJBgN.s:3181: Error: symbol `.LEHE1' is already defined /tmp/cctHJBgN.s:3214: Error: symbol `.LEHB2' is already defined /tmp/cctHJBgN.s:3216: Error: symbol `.LEHE2' is already defined make: *** [os-unix.pic.o] Error 1 > I know there are other problems with DWARF2 output, so I don't promise > the resulting DWARF2 is correct, but it should at least assemble. > > It'd be good if you could provide a small test case that triggers the > problem, I didn't manage to generate one. I'll try, but IMHO it's quite hard. Do you have any advice which can help me with it? Thanks, Karel PS: I've used CVS sources 3 hours old + your patch. -- Karel Gardas kgardas@objectsecurity.com ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-01-08 12:21 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2002-12-13 4:04 [pch-branch] missing binary operator issue Karel Gardas 2003-01-02 17:59 ` Geoff Keating 2003-01-02 21:26 ` Karel Gardas 2003-01-02 22:21 ` Andrew Pinski 2003-01-07 19:32 ` Geoff Keating 2003-01-08 16:06 ` Karel Gardas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).