From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21171 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2004 18:47:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21164 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2004 18:47:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO thinkpad.wg-ro-gar1.inext.cz) (212.111.6.80) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Jan 2004 18:47:52 -0000 Received: from karel (helo=localhost) by thinkpad.wg-ro-gar1.inext.cz with local-esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Aj0vd-0002U9-00; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 19:48:45 +0100 Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 18:47:00 -0000 From: Karel Gardas X-X-Sender: karel@thinkpad.wg-ro-gar1.inext.cz To: Giovanni Bajo cc: GCC Mailing List Subject: Bugreports from MICO compile-time testing submited [was: Re: [UPDATED] GCC 3.4.0 20040114 + GCC 3.3.2 compile-time performance comparison on MICO project sources.] In-Reply-To: <2e6801c3df48$f30b4fb0$34b82997@bagio> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01533.txt.bz2 On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Giovanni Bajo wrote: > Karel Gardas wrote: > > > I would also like to post bugreport to bugzilla, but I don't know how > > to attach preprocessed file there. Is it possible to add them after > > clicking on ``Commit'' button? > > Yes. Please, create a new bug report for *each* different regression. It's > easier for us to track and comment on them, since they're different bugs > anyway. At the end I have just submited three general bugs: (13775, 13776, 13777). If you need you can submit new one after the code analysis and if there will be really different bugs. Also url to _all_ preprocessed sources are provided in bugreports. Cheers, Karel -- Karel Gardas kgardas@objectsecurity.com ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com